Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

PowerToThePeople

(9,610 posts)
2. this would require a complete reversal of how we currently handle data
Mon Aug 12, 2013, 04:42 PM
Aug 2013

But, It would not be the first time in US history that major changes occurred. Currently we put everything out publicly and hope/assume that it is handled correctly. What if everything defaulted to anonymity first, with the individual in control of releasing it as needed? A Visa or Master-card that resembled a cash transaction? No tracking built into the system. What has happened imo, is that the system grew so big so fast, that there was not any thought to the long term repercussions. Maybe it is time to rethink things a bit. Maybe tear down some of the transaction logic and rebuild new logic based on privacy. This would likely be software solutions. No real need to modify any hardware. All of that infrastructure could remain.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

4th Amendment for the 21st century [View all] PowerToThePeople Aug 2013 OP
There definitely needs to be discussion on the handling of data. Egnever Aug 2013 #1
this would require a complete reversal of how we currently handle data PowerToThePeople Aug 2013 #2
There are unintended consequences Egnever Aug 2013 #3
I have had the phone call when I was traveling PowerToThePeople Aug 2013 #5
I would love to just outright agree with you but Egnever Aug 2013 #9
it would certainly break the internet as we know it. PowerToThePeople Aug 2013 #10
It might not be Egnever Aug 2013 #11
psst... usGovOwesUs3Trillion Aug 2013 #14
headscratch PowerToThePeople Aug 2013 #15
The Privacy Pirates don't like restraints usGovOwesUs3Trillion Aug 2013 #6
I do wish someone up on the hill would stand up for our digital rights. PowerToThePeople Aug 2013 #7
They didn't need to edit an existing civil right though usGovOwesUs3Trillion Aug 2013 #8
I'd say and effects covers that, too usGovOwesUs3Trillion Aug 2013 #4
Yes, because to DOJ does not share your view PowerToThePeople Aug 2013 #12
Time to go to SCOTUS usGovOwesUs3Trillion Aug 2013 #13
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»4th Amendment for the 21s...»Reply #2