Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Dangeroulsy Naive, or Liar(s) -- SnowGlen. [View all]Tarheel_Dem
(31,454 posts)41. Naive or not, they work for Putin now, and good luck with that!

Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
74 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Manning tried that in his defense, and the judge shut it down pretty quickly. I think
msanthrope
Aug 2013
#7
Apart for Jason Bourne-inspired fantasies, what 'torture' is Snowden facing from the
msanthrope
Aug 2013
#9
You keep right on laughing about the notion of "torture!" The yucks are tremendous!
villager
Aug 2013
#25
I am laughing at Mr. Snowden and his fantastical notions--I mean, who puts on a red hood
msanthrope
Aug 2013
#28
Yes--because GIGGLING at Snowden is support of the MIC!! Wait, I thought it wasn't about him? nt
msanthrope
Aug 2013
#40
Reining in the MIC isn't going to happen through a guy in a red hood. That's a super hero shortcut
msanthrope
Aug 2013
#49
Of course it does....but the Executive doesn't make the budget, and doesn't create law. Article 2
msanthrope
Aug 2013
#52
This goes back to the Constitution--the Executive is limited because the Executive
msanthrope
Aug 2013
#54
Well if the Constitution says it, it must always be true! Why those silly worries about Bush,
villager
Aug 2013
#55
You can't trust people who lie to you, even if they're trying to give you the least untruthful
hughee99
Aug 2013
#4
Yep, he is such a fool, how did he ever manage to pants the NSA in public like this?
bemildred
Aug 2013
#5
Judgement is called for, lots of it, severe and stringent judgement, a bias towards doing NOTHING.
bemildred
Aug 2013
#27
A guy who writes on intelligence for Reuters, the Atlantic, the NYT, is obscure to you?
msanthrope
Aug 2013
#19
You might want to read up on his lobbying on behalf of torture states and the defense industry.
DisgustipatedinCA
Aug 2013
#68
"The U.S. government should be on your knees every day praying that nothing happens to Snowden..."
ProSense
Aug 2013
#10
GG tried that type of bravado against Patrick Fitzgerald when he was representing Matt Hale--and it
msanthrope
Aug 2013
#16
Oh yeah--anybody who thinks GG isn't going to screw over Snowden the way he screwed over Matt
msanthrope
Aug 2013
#42
"stop assuming the first version of the “facts” is correct". Good advice, but outrage junkies can't
Tarheel_Dem
Aug 2013
#72
It's kind of like self-flagellation on their parts: "Spy on me! Spy on me! I deserve it!"
villager
Aug 2013
#47
I do, too. Especially when the messenger in this case is a guy who had repeatedly gotten GG
msanthrope
Aug 2013
#44
****DER SPIEGEL IS WORKING WITH THE NSA!!!**** or...that's what SnowGlen said so it must
uponit7771
Aug 2013
#34
Why are you posting material from a man who shills for Khazakstan's torture regime?
DisgustipatedinCA
Aug 2013
#66