Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

phleshdef

(11,936 posts)
19. Yea, I don't read that stuff.
Wed Aug 14, 2013, 08:08 PM
Aug 2013

But that doesn't change the fact that you agree to whats in there when you sign up for something. That's one of the reasons that the NSA programs, at least based on verifiable facts, are completely legal. Now just because something is legal doesn't mean it should be done. But that's the situation as is.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I know exactly who should be appointed to investigate... burnodo Aug 2013 #1
Oliver North? Scotter Libby? Dick-head Cheney? nm rhett o rick Aug 2013 #4
ya, like that's gonna happen... FirstLight Aug 2013 #2
Its an authoritarian wet dream. Warren DeMontague Aug 2013 #3
You're apt to be alerted on. The authoritarians here dont like to be called authoritarians. nm rhett o rick Aug 2013 #6
You will note I did not include Warren DeMontague Aug 2013 #7
I'm stunned...I thought for sure that must be your title instead of Forbes. dkf Aug 2013 #5
I Don't Write 'Em... I Just Report 'Em... WillyT Aug 2013 #8
Well you couldn't be more on target than that anyway! dkf Aug 2013 #9
Does Obama still stand by his stmt there's no spying? leftstreet Aug 2013 #10
There is a fine line between rhetoric and lying. We would like to know his rhett o rick Aug 2013 #11
Yes... Apparently Plain English Doesn't Do It There Days... WillyT Aug 2013 #13
But, but no where does it mention meta-data, therefore it's fair game. nm rhett o rick Aug 2013 #15
Its not YOUR persons, houses, papers or effects. phleshdef Aug 2013 #16
Evidently Google is now claiming that the contents of Gmail have no expectation of privacy Fumesucker Aug 2013 #17
I'd say most of them have clauses in their terms of service that would allow them to make... phleshdef Aug 2013 #20
Dude... When Was The Last Time You, Or Anyone Of Us, Actually Read The TOS We Agreed To ??? WillyT Aug 2013 #18
Yea, I don't read that stuff. phleshdef Aug 2013 #19
Hell they don't even read them here.......... Historic NY Aug 2013 #26
And, if all the ISPs are subject to NSA demands, etc., what option do consumers have? spooky3 Aug 2013 #35
Lets see what Joe Biden said about the government mining of metadata in 2006: bvar22 Aug 2013 #45
Why don't you try reading what I said and THEN respond? phleshdef Aug 2013 #49
Oh come on, thats not fair DJ13 Aug 2013 #52
Kick And Recommend cantbeserious Aug 2013 #12
kick burnodo Aug 2013 #14
That Forbes Article is Fantastic Read...and Here's a Snip: KoKo Aug 2013 #21
+1000000000 woo me with science Aug 2013 #22
+1 leftstreet Aug 2013 #24
Poindexter their asses n/t hootinholler Aug 2013 #41
Yes, indeed! DeSwiss Aug 2013 #23
this stuff will never stop... dtom67 Aug 2013 #25
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ,,,,,,,,,,,, /nt Cryptoad Aug 2013 #27
You're New... Right ??? WillyT Aug 2013 #28
Hardly /nt Cryptoad Aug 2013 #31
Ok... WillyT Aug 2013 #37
Ohhhhhh Cryptoad Aug 2013 #43
Resurrection Alert! eom 99th_Monkey Aug 2013 #38
huh? /nt Cryptoad Aug 2013 #44
What was/is your "other" DU Screen name? bvar22 Aug 2013 #46
Reading is a critical skill.... Cryptoad Aug 2013 #48
Aaah, what would the first author know about these matters? spooky3 Aug 2013 #29
When are they Cryptoad Aug 2013 #32
You can bet that the authors would be sued if what they reported were groundless. spooky3 Aug 2013 #34
That's what a special prosecutor's job is. Thanks for agreeing with the OP (nt) muriel_volestrangler Aug 2013 #50
Fitzmas 2.2.31.f IDemo Aug 2013 #30
Is the Cryptoad Aug 2013 #33
It would be nice if you would discuss the article instead of snarking thru the thread. nt Mojorabbit Aug 2013 #40
The original thread Cryptoad Aug 2013 #42
K&R eom 99th_Monkey Aug 2013 #36
K and R nt Mojorabbit Aug 2013 #39
ROFL snooper2 Aug 2013 #47
Fiber Optic Products > Splitter Cabinets muriel_volestrangler Aug 2013 #51
:) snooper2 Aug 2013 #53
The main point is that the whistleblower describes the NSA equipment muriel_volestrangler Aug 2013 #54
The whistleblower doesn't really know what he is talking about snooper2 Aug 2013 #55
Why do you say "it doesn't work like that" and then proceed to describe it working like that? muriel_volestrangler Aug 2013 #56
because when he says a "portion", if he knew he wouldn't use that word snooper2 Aug 2013 #57
Why do you think the word 'portion' is not suitable? muriel_volestrangler Aug 2013 #58
Well Done! bvar22 Aug 2013 #59
K & R AzDar Aug 2013 #60
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»NSA, DEA, IRS Lie About F...»Reply #19