Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

stupidicus

(2,570 posts)
50. Oh I don't know
Tue Aug 27, 2013, 01:32 PM
Aug 2013

I'd say he has a leg up on you at least in terms of being able to figure out that the respect many have for him, GG, the Damons, Ellsbergs, etc, etc , etc, and/or their efforts, merely rhetorical or otherwise, isn't like the kinda love they have for their family/friends/pets, and doesn't come close to the denotative definition of "worship" either.

Those kinda comparisons and license taken with words like "worship" are obvious efforts to belittle legitimate non-love expressions of agreement with which you disagree, and more often than not, in lieu of any meaningful or substantive way of undermining the reasons things like respect, etc, are offered to them for specific acts.

That's why it's not about Snowden, etc, and rather about what he did in this narrow and specific case. One could easily concede (based on our shared opinion of rightwing libertarians) that this is an example of a generally speaking, a bad person doing good, like Bush's efforts in Africa for example, but to focus on the bad in Bush in no way diminishes the obvious good his actions in that case have had. Unlike with Bush (whose sins/crimes aren't even remotely comparable to Snowdens/GG alleged worship) however, where his likely motives -- a desire for redemption perhaps, either in the eyes of his god, for his legacy, etc -- Snowden's, GG's, etc motives are clearly based in/on things that are part of/flow from their ideological/moral makeup (unless of course, you wanna argue that libertarains, whether of the left or right variety, haven't long objected to such) which is shared by those who "love" them, even if there's a great deal of disagreement coming from the same sources. An indictment of them in the narrow context of their efforts to reveal and curtail the survelliance state is also an indictment of all of us that object to one and who agree with their motives and efforts. All of this "Paulite" BS differs not one iota from the BS rightwingnuts spewed about how us anti-Iraq war folks supported SH, and "hated the troops and loved the terrorists" for that matter.

That's no doubt why we've seen all the various ways they've (and those of us that agree with them on this in ways you repeat daily -- like here) been attacked as messengers, and efforts made to undermine their credibility ranging from boxes in their garages to their libertarianism -- it stalls the inevitability of having to take a personal stand, pro or con, on the issue. There's little doubt in anyones mind at this point that had these revelations been made by a dedicated, lifetime "liberal", and reported by Eugene Robinson, that they'd have similarly been crucified by your type, and poor Eugene no doubt would be a designated self-loathing black man by now and an UT for libertarians. Your emotional investment may not be of the kind you seek to conjure up and belittle here, but you are no doubt invested heavily, no?

It doesn't matter whether you "worship" BHO or not. If you are opposed to a "Stasi" state as some characterize it, as a voter/supporter of his, he appears to have tossed you aside. The amount of emotional investment one puts into Snowden, GG, or BHO has no impact on the realities of the SS or the remedies of it. And your solely loving your family, friends, and little puppy dogs and kittens too doesn't make you on balance a "good" (much less a better one) or even a "smart" person, given that the common Nazi or AQ member no doubt satisfies that minimum of societal expectations.

And all your efforts to malign the gratefullness and respect those "villians" have generated/garnered through their actions on this matter due to the common ground shared, makes your possession of excessive goodness or smarts highly suspect, and makes you more like those rightwingnut libertarians (at least in terms of illegitimate debating tactics use as noted above and "goodness" standards) than whatever agreement is shared on this issue those you belittle with these efforts could ever hope to achieve.

So, "please continue". You guys are some of the best entertainment around here

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

And cue the Player Haters Club, Damon Edition Pt 2 Bluenorthwest Aug 2013 #1
I'll never watch Bourne Identity again, dammit! nashville_brook Aug 2013 #3
Heh. R. Daneel Olivaw Aug 2013 #11
Matt Damon never really loved Him!!! QC Aug 2013 #31
We need new and improved snarly emoticons Enthusiast Aug 2013 #19
Oh Damon. You never really loved him. You love Rand and wanted a pony. neverforget Aug 2013 #2
"But he's just an actor!" nt Bonobo Aug 2013 #4
With a big, toothy grin! WorseBeforeBetter Aug 2013 #5
And obviously more intelligent than that other actor guy worshipped by the Repugs... maddiemom Aug 2013 #37
That one is espcially great from the 'I support Al Franken' set. Bluenorthwest Aug 2013 #54
Looking forward to the BOG telling us how Damon is a whiner... again. DesMoinesDem Aug 2013 #6
She has left the building. RC Aug 2013 #9
You bastard! hootinholler Aug 2013 #33
Every board needs a little comic relief. Jackpine Radical Aug 2013 #47
Is there some thread I missed? What happened? DesMoinesDem Aug 2013 #35
Never mind, she's back. RC Aug 2013 #38
For good behavior Jackpine Radical Aug 2013 #28
Apparently for reprogramming. RC Aug 2013 #39
lolol!! darkangel218 Aug 2013 #74
K&R! SammyWinstonJack Aug 2013 #7
If Ben agrees with Matt we won't be allowed to see the next Batman. rug Aug 2013 #8
K&R DeSwiss Aug 2013 #10
Scary! tblue Aug 2013 #13
+1 idwiyo Aug 2013 #17
Pluuuus one. Enthusiast Aug 2013 #20
Truth. Little Star Aug 2013 #25
+10000000000 woo me with science Aug 2013 #26
That graphic deserves its own Opening Post. RC Aug 2013 #40
did you post that pic as an OP? It's worth it. yurbud Aug 2013 #49
... AzDar Aug 2013 #12
K&R NealK Aug 2013 #14
well, done, Matt Damon! tavalon Aug 2013 #15
K&R idwiyo Aug 2013 #16
Hot AND smart, he's a double threat. LuvNewcastle Aug 2013 #18
du rec. xchrom Aug 2013 #21
knr Douglas Carpenter Aug 2013 #22
Recommended madfloridian Aug 2013 #23
Matt Damon, your one smart cookie! k&r Little Star Aug 2013 #24
It's not about Matt Damon. tridim Aug 2013 #27
Who ''loves the Pauls on DU''? Octafish Aug 2013 #29
I don't love Obama. That kind of hero worship is a Neo-DU problem, not mine. tridim Aug 2013 #30
Haven't you heard? hootinholler Aug 2013 #34
By Jove, I think I've got it! Trickle Down is good. Octafish Aug 2013 #36
Funny? Not really. RC Aug 2013 #41
DU is a progressive site, or at least it used to be. That's why I came here in 2001. tridim Aug 2013 #43
Really? hootinholler Aug 2013 #46
indeed, that's the most amusing thing about these people stupidicus Aug 2013 #51
Oh it's real hero worship. tridim Aug 2013 #53
You wear your Obama worship on your sleeve Ocelot Aug 2013 #70
Post removed Post removed Aug 2013 #52
Got Nuance? hootinholler Aug 2013 #60
my my, did we take your awareness pill today? stupidicus Aug 2013 #42
Snowden could never have been me. Ever. tridim Aug 2013 #44
Oh I don't know stupidicus Aug 2013 #50
It's a shame about the hide hootinholler Aug 2013 #68
Of course not. LiberalLovinLug Aug 2013 #67
GG =Walter Cronkite ???? bbkenn92 Aug 2013 #71
Closer To Walter Cronkite Than David Gregory/George Stephanopolis/Et. Al... WillyT Aug 2013 #72
I didn't say that stupidicus Aug 2013 #77
you got nothing... you can't argue the point being made fascisthunter Aug 2013 #73
Hey,if it's not about Snowden, then it's not about Damon. nt Progressive dog Aug 2013 #32
K&R forestpath Aug 2013 #45
and it should be made based on accurate information not PR bullshit yurbud Aug 2013 #48
Matt who? Itchinjim Aug 2013 #55
The guy my son calls Meth Damon. AtomicKitten Aug 2013 #56
That is a seriously dead on funny line. I'm stealing it. Bluenorthwest Aug 2013 #57
It does fit the character quite nicely, doesn't it? AtomicKitten Aug 2013 #58
It's a great wise crack. Bluenorthwest Aug 2013 #66
Except... I'm Pretty Sure That's Jesse Plemons... WillyT Aug 2013 #59
I know. That's why I said he's a character from Breaking Bad. AtomicKitten Aug 2013 #62
Ah... Got It... Thanks... WillyT Aug 2013 #64
Of course it is. He has a bit of the Damon about his look, and he's on Breaking Bad so 'Meth Damon' Bluenorthwest Aug 2013 #63
Got It... Thanks! WillyT Aug 2013 #65
Love Matt Damon. He's a political junkie with AikidoSoul Aug 2013 #61
Matt grew up two or three doors down from truedelphi Aug 2013 #69
K&R! Phlem Aug 2013 #75
This little-old-lady is giving Matt Damon a sweet kick! nt Ninga Aug 2013 #76
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why Thank You, Matt Damon...»Reply #50