Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Who is responsible for the chemical attacks in Syria? [View all]Savannahmann
(3,891 posts)15. Correction
Fact: There were chemical attacks in Syria. That isn't being disputed. Who do you believe is responsible?
Facts appear to be that roughly 1,400 people including women and children died. We are not yet certain that it was an attack by Chemical Weapons, like nerve agents be it Sarin, or VX class weapons. That is the conclusion of people who haven't been there, and are operating on symptomatic evidence.
There are other possibilities that will be eliminated with laboratory testing by the UN. Alternatives include some sort of accident which is not being considered like the Bhopal Disaster. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bhopal_disaster
Because if we rush, we're certain to make some mistakes. Like the famed Operation Infinite Reach which bombed a factory our Intelligence People swore up and down was making Chemical Weapons in the Sudan. Turns out to have been a factory cranking out chemicals all right, Aspirin. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cruise_missile_strikes_on_Afghanistan_and_Sudan_(August_1998) Or worse another Iraq Intelligence pile of Bullshit.
So let's wait and see what the UN Labs in Europe turn up as the actual evidence of what the facts may be shall we? We're told that those results will be back with the full report in two weeks. Are we saying that our mighty mailed fist of vengeance can't be stayed for two lousy weeks while we confirm our information?
So the facts are that it is reported that 1,400 people died, and it is suspected that Chemical Weapons were used. We have little direct evidence of what weapon if any was used.
Many people thought that this event was a Chemical Weapons attack as well. http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/gas-cloud-kills-cameroon-villagers
That was a natural event, a tragic and horrific event, but a naturally occurring event none the less.
BTW. I am not saying that Syrian victims were not attacked with Chemical Weapons. I am saying that we don't know what the facts are, and apparently our Government is in no hurry to find out.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
30 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Going out on a limb based on rumors that it was an accidental release by rebels.
NYC_SKP
Aug 2013
#2
I wouldn't use them as references. You have to admit, though, it would be an interesting twist.
NYC_SKP
Aug 2013
#16
Apparently, the Syrian Defense Minister was out of the loop, if it was the gov't, he didn't
leveymg
Aug 2013
#7