Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
34. It is way more likely to happen if Al Queda, who are also suspects with Saudi backing, are not held
Tue Sep 3, 2013, 12:11 PM
Sep 2013

accountable. Far more likely. In fact isn't that the main reason we are given for the infamous WOT? That, heaven forbid, Al Queda might get their hands on Chemical and/or Nuclear Weapons?? Now it appears this is exactly what may have happened.

It's amazing that we are no longer concerned about Al Queda getting their hands on these weapons. Was that all a lie too?

Time to take this to the International Court before we end up killing more people based on lies and on 'inclusive evidence'.

Nolan has now seen the 'evidence' and states he is even more convinced now to oppose this invasion.

That's good enough for me along with the British Parliament's rejection of Cameron's 'evidence'.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Kerry has made a fool of himself over this issue. last1standing Sep 2013 #1
His agenda is showing, for sure. n/t Junkdrawer Sep 2013 #2
Kerry has made a fool of himself liberalhistorian Sep 2013 #18
That's absurd G_j Sep 2013 #3
Minor detail. Stop quibbling. Let freedom reign. jsr Sep 2013 #4
That is not what France reported in full. ProSense Sep 2013 #5
If evidence "appears to confirm 1500", why didn't France confirm 1500? David Krout Sep 2013 #8
So you're rejecting that part of the report? ProSense Sep 2013 #13
Woah! Hold on, you went from "appeared to confirmed," to "confirmed" David Krout Sep 2013 #16
"adding that evidence appeared to confirm an estimated 1,500 deaths. " ProSense Sep 2013 #17
Baloney - 281 confirmed means officially confirmed and identified. blm Sep 2013 #19
Provide the names. These are human beings, it is disgusting to see such a tragedy used for political sabrina 1 Sep 2013 #27
At least ProSense Sep 2013 #28
Anyone launching an attack on kids, clusterbombing them, White Phosphorousing them, bombing them, sabrina 1 Sep 2013 #30
"Did Assad do this?" ProSense Sep 2013 #31
So how does the US address the world wide charges of hypocrisy on matters of War Crimes? sabrina 1 Sep 2013 #32
"France has zero credibility on Syria or Libya." ProSense Sep 2013 #36
Why quibble over the exact number? treestar Sep 2013 #6
You assume Assad did it David Krout Sep 2013 #9
That's pretty well established treestar Sep 2013 #12
No, it's not. What IS well established is that there is a big, well funded push.... Junkdrawer Sep 2013 #14
This 'evidence' of a chemical attack was manufactured by Obama the same way blm Sep 2013 #20
There is not a single sentence in the article you link that supports a charge of Obama manufacturing grantcart Sep 2013 #25
I know - which is why I stated it the way I did. blm Sep 2013 #37
Can you substantiate that it's "pretty well established" deutsey Sep 2013 #15
From Der Spiegel- please follow link and read whole article. KittyWampus Sep 2013 #24
Thanks deutsey Sep 2013 #26
It is way more likely to happen if Al Queda, who are also suspects with Saudi backing, are not held sabrina 1 Sep 2013 #34
They did at least have the sense to round to the nearest whole number. David__77 Sep 2013 #7
But nothing says "certainty" like three places after the decimal. Junkdrawer Sep 2013 #10
Must confess the figure did sound odd dipsydoodle Sep 2013 #11
"I have in my hand a list of... JayhawkSD Sep 2013 #21
This message was self-deleted by its author proverbialwisdom Sep 2013 #22
Lies like poison gas JEB Sep 2013 #23
Only 1,429? His boss says THOUSANDS! jsr Sep 2013 #29
Everything tells you that this is all for public consumption... Junkdrawer Sep 2013 #38
One more BIG question. We do not have enough facts to go to war in this situation. jwirr Sep 2013 #33
In war, truth is the first casualty. - Aeschylus Tierra_y_Libertad Sep 2013 #35
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Kerry's claim of 1429 Syr...»Reply #34