Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)AGGRESSIVE California U.S. Attorney Says SHE'LL KEEP PROSECUTING On Marijuana [View all]

In the past few years, as some medical marijuana business people have been made into criminals in states with their own laws, no state has been more center stage than California. The state saw the first marijuana law, so the medical marijuana industry has had longer to develop. And crackdowns have been vigorous, particularly at the hands of U.S. Attorney Melinda Haag, who covers the Northern District of California.
It is Haag who is pursuing seizure of two major Bay Area dispensaries that even the cities that host them have considered crucial to public health and defended in court. It is Haag who played a key role in the raid of a dispensary that was the model for a county program to police pot. And it is Haag who recently threatened some seemingly state-compliant dispensaries with as much as 40 years in jail. In its latest guidance, the Department of Justice made explicit that the size and commercial nature of a dispensary was no longer reason enough to prosecute. And Haag has been equally explicit that size and commercial nature played a role in her crackdowns, saying, The larger the operation, the greater the likelihood that there will be abuse of the states medical marijuana laws, and marijuana in the hands of individuals who do not have a demonstrated medical need.
Nonetheless, Haag said Friday that she does not expect a significant change in her approach, adding, for the most part it appears that the cases that have been brought in this district are already in compliance with the guidelines. There are a number of grounds on which Haag might be able to justify this comment. The guidelines leave significant leeway to determine what constitutes a strong and effective regulatory system, when there is exacerbation of drugged driving or other public health consequences, and when a dispensary is considered to be marketing to minors. But Haags explicit professed targeting of dispensaries because they are large and commercial would make such justifications particularly suspect.
Her response is an early demonstration of how the DOJs announcement will require the cooperation of the regional U.S. attorneys to change the legal landscape.
http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2013/09/04/2568071/aggressive-california-attorney-says-shell-prosecuting-marijuana/
90 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
AGGRESSIVE California U.S. Attorney Says SHE'LL KEEP PROSECUTING On Marijuana [View all]
Segami
Sep 2013
OP
In a functional system the legal system would be answerable to politicians?!?
Donald Ian Rankin
Sep 2013
#53
Yeah, it's a rotten shame they can't just fire her. Shame on whomever appointed this RW zealot
indepat
Sep 2013
#68
They can order her to direct her assets towards specific crimes (and apparently have done so).
Scuba
Sep 2013
#69
Then shame on those who order her to direct her assets toward the prosecution of marijuana
indepat
Sep 2013
#75
As expected the DAs are all fucknutz insane on WOD and will ignore Holder.
Warren Stupidity
Sep 2013
#3
She is not a DA, she's a United States Attorney who serves at the pleasure of Obama
Bluenorthwest
Sep 2013
#73
It's more "good cop/bad cop" garbage. Obama been playing this game since 2009. nt
Romulox
Sep 2013
#5
Both Clinton and Obama greatly ramped up the Drug war as compared to their Republican predecessors.
Romulox
Sep 2013
#15
To his credit, he does try to be nonpolitical in these matters. But it doesn't serve
kestrel91316
Sep 2013
#59
If the federal drug laws were actually rescinded or changed that would definitely end these actions.
mulsh
Sep 2013
#22
The Controlled Substance Act gives the power to the Executive Branch to unilaterally reschedule
Romulox
Sep 2013
#26
Obama could reschedule cannabis to schgedule 2 today...if he wanted to end the madness
TeamPooka
Sep 2013
#35
Persecuting, arresting, prosecuting, and imprisoning herb growers, etc, is big business in N. Cal.
Zorra
Sep 2013
#25
She is the epitome of the type of human closed mindedness that slows humanity's progress.
Lint Head
Sep 2013
#31
Prohibition is a failed public policy...again. But she's too dumb to know it. nt
TeamPooka
Sep 2013
#34
That's the same argument that was used to keep slavery in place...it's the law. Find a new argument.
TeamPooka
Sep 2013
#38
it is the content of your posts that is more revealing than the quantity of your posts
TeamPooka
Sep 2013
#70
We are a polce state and have more prisoners in jail than any country in the world.
TeamPooka
Sep 2013
#66
I gave it the attention it deserved, to be sure. It was standard authoritarian apologia claptrap.
Romulox
Sep 2013
#80
Your first post to this thread was "Who cares if it's the law", btw. Way to move the goalposts! nt
Romulox
Sep 2013
#81
This woman is a United States Attorney appointed by Obama and she serves at his pleasure
Bluenorthwest
Sep 2013
#76
Seizeure of assets is a major motivator for law enforcement. As always, follow the money.
Scuba
Sep 2013
#71
Her actions would indicate that she serves the interests of the cartels which profit
Bluenorthwest
Sep 2013
#83