Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

My hubby and I are against it nadinbrzezinski Sep 2013 #1
Very ambivalent hack89 Sep 2013 #2
No fuggin' way! rdharma Sep 2013 #3
Justice must be delivered to Assad Cryptoad Sep 2013 #4
To protect the whole world? rdharma Sep 2013 #6
yea,,,,, Cryptoad Sep 2013 #12
Not even the administration has made that claim nadinbrzezinski Sep 2013 #13
I didnt say they did Cryptoad Sep 2013 #14
You are making jumps of logic nadinbrzezinski Sep 2013 #17
I preferr to keep my eyes Cryptoad Sep 2013 #20
I guess fiction is good. nadinbrzezinski Sep 2013 #21
I wondered Cryptoad Sep 2013 #22
Well, you are the one talking non existent nukes nadinbrzezinski Sep 2013 #23
No exceptions , heh? Cryptoad Sep 2013 #28
Yes, no exceptions nadinbrzezinski Sep 2013 #31
I would like to live in World Cryptoad Sep 2013 #33
The rest of us would like to nadinbrzezinski Sep 2013 #35
JUst like a Draft with on exceptions... nt Cryptoad Sep 2013 #37
And without this, a grand war adventure will continue nadinbrzezinski Sep 2013 #39
I never said I support War.. Cryptoad Sep 2013 #40
Ok I guess you support fucking for virginity nadinbrzezinski Sep 2013 #41
Geez,,,,,, I never said any of this you claim i have Cryptoad Sep 2013 #43
So how are you going to deliver justice to Assad? nadinbrzezinski Sep 2013 #44
not intented to insult Cryptoad Sep 2013 #46
Damn Crypto... Had No Idea...When And Where Did You Serve ??? WillyT Sep 2013 #8
68 & 69 Cryptoad Sep 2013 #11
Where? tkmorris Sep 2013 #51
Remember the Gulf of Tonkin!!!11111!! Link Speed Sep 2013 #5
Hell no. Fix our own problems and don't create any more combat vets, they don't even take care of Katashi_itto Sep 2013 #7
I am opposed to a strike, but that's based more on my head than my gut pinboy3niner Sep 2013 #9
My opposition is also from nadinbrzezinski Sep 2013 #16
Don't you think the use of gas weapons demands a strong response? Schema Thing Sep 2013 #18
Sometimes discretion truly is the better part of valor. nt pinboy3niner Sep 2013 #25
The Part that People like Assad Cryptoad Sep 2013 #30
Wasn't it the US that sold him the gas used in Halabja? nt Mnemosyne Sep 2013 #34
Yes, I think perhaps so, and I alluded to that in my post, didn't I? Schema Thing Sep 2013 #36
Kindly point that out for me, I was/am tired and may have missed it. tia nt Mnemosyne Sep 2013 #50
Here: Schema Thing Sep 2013 #53
Thanx for your post.Some people just don't give a damn and care even less about the future. lumpy Sep 2013 #52
Thank You !!! WillyT Sep 2013 #19
Not a vet, but this rocks! - nt HardTimes99 Sep 2013 #24
^^^This^^^. nt. wild bird Sep 2013 #45
Somebody said.. a long time ago... Bigmack Sep 2013 #10
I feel it is a huge mistake. I feel we could end up either not making any change.... actslikeacarrot Sep 2013 #15
DH and I are both against it. Feel it could lead to WWIII LiberalLoner Sep 2013 #26
Did You Catch This ??? WillyT Sep 2013 #29
I think you'll appreciate this video Electric Monk Sep 2013 #38
Peace now and always. RGinNJ Sep 2013 #27
I have no problem with limited strikes if we can take out the launchers. 4bucksagallon Sep 2013 #32
Not only NO, but FUCK NO!!!!!!!!!!!!! wild bird Sep 2013 #42
I vote hell no. NuclearDem Sep 2013 #47
My cousin's husband is a Vietnam vet BuelahWitch Sep 2013 #48
NO, No and no. SQUEE Sep 2013 #49
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»If I Could Be So Bold... ...»Reply #34