General Discussion

Electric Monk

(13,869 posts)

38. I think you'll appreciate this video

Reply to WillyT (Reply #29)

Sat Sep 7, 2013, 10:29 PM

Sep 2013

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1017143855

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

53 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

If I Could Be So Bold... I'd Like To Ask Any Actual Former "Warriors" How They Feel About... [View all] WillyT Sep 2013 OP

My hubby and I are against it nadinbrzezinski Sep 2013 #1

Very ambivalent hack89 Sep 2013 #2

No fuggin' way! rdharma Sep 2013 #3

Justice must be delivered to Assad Cryptoad Sep 2013 #4

To protect the whole world? rdharma Sep 2013 #6

yea,,,,, Cryptoad Sep 2013 #12

Not even the administration has made that claim nadinbrzezinski Sep 2013 #13

I didnt say they did Cryptoad Sep 2013 #14

You are making jumps of logic nadinbrzezinski Sep 2013 #17

I preferr to keep my eyes Cryptoad Sep 2013 #20

I guess fiction is good. nadinbrzezinski Sep 2013 #21

I wondered Cryptoad Sep 2013 #22

Well, you are the one talking non existent nukes nadinbrzezinski Sep 2013 #23

No exceptions , heh? Cryptoad Sep 2013 #28

Yes, no exceptions nadinbrzezinski Sep 2013 #31

I would like to live in World Cryptoad Sep 2013 #33

The rest of us would like to nadinbrzezinski Sep 2013 #35

JUst like a Draft with on exceptions... nt Cryptoad Sep 2013 #37

And without this, a grand war adventure will continue nadinbrzezinski Sep 2013 #39

I never said I support War.. Cryptoad Sep 2013 #40

Ok I guess you support fucking for virginity nadinbrzezinski Sep 2013 #41

Geez,,,,,, I never said any of this you claim i have Cryptoad Sep 2013 #43

So how are you going to deliver justice to Assad? nadinbrzezinski Sep 2013 #44

not intented to insult Cryptoad Sep 2013 #46

Damn Crypto... Had No Idea...When And Where Did You Serve ??? WillyT Sep 2013 #8

68 & 69 Cryptoad Sep 2013 #11

Where? tkmorris Sep 2013 #51

Remember the Gulf of Tonkin!!!11111!! Link Speed Sep 2013 #5

Hell no. Fix our own problems and don't create any more combat vets, they don't even take care of Katashi_itto Sep 2013 #7

I am opposed to a strike, but that's based more on my head than my gut pinboy3niner Sep 2013 #9

My opposition is also from nadinbrzezinski Sep 2013 #16

Don't you think the use of gas weapons demands a strong response? Schema Thing Sep 2013 #18

Sometimes discretion truly is the better part of valor. nt pinboy3niner Sep 2013 #25

The Part that People like Assad Cryptoad Sep 2013 #30

Wasn't it the US that sold him the gas used in Halabja? nt Mnemosyne Sep 2013 #34

Yes, I think perhaps so, and I alluded to that in my post, didn't I? Schema Thing Sep 2013 #36

Kindly point that out for me, I was/am tired and may have missed it. tia nt Mnemosyne Sep 2013 #50

Here: Schema Thing Sep 2013 #53

Thanx for your post.Some people just don't give a damn and care even less about the future. lumpy Sep 2013 #52

Thank You !!! WillyT Sep 2013 #19

Not a vet, but this rocks! - nt HardTimes99 Sep 2013 #24

^^^This^^^. nt. wild bird Sep 2013 #45

Somebody said.. a long time ago... Bigmack Sep 2013 #10

I feel it is a huge mistake. I feel we could end up either not making any change.... actslikeacarrot Sep 2013 #15

DH and I are both against it. Feel it could lead to WWIII LiberalLoner Sep 2013 #26

Did You Catch This ??? WillyT Sep 2013 #29

I think you'll appreciate this video Electric Monk Sep 2013 #38

Peace now and always. RGinNJ Sep 2013 #27

I have no problem with limited strikes if we can take out the launchers. 4bucksagallon Sep 2013 #32

Not only NO, but FUCK NO!!!!!!!!!!!!! wild bird Sep 2013 #42

I vote hell no. NuclearDem Sep 2013 #47

My cousin's husband is a Vietnam vet BuelahWitch Sep 2013 #48

NO, No and no. SQUEE Sep 2013 #49