Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

LiberalFighter

(53,544 posts)

19. They need to attack this legislation piece by piece.

Reply to Liberal_in_LA (Original post)

Tue Feb 28, 2012, 10:31 PM

Feb 2012

This part about allowing potential grandparents to sue is so wrong. The same for fathers that are not even a spouse. I would think that normally women would discuss this with their husbands before considering an abortion. And that in those cases that don't involve negative issues with the husband and an abortion is performed against the wishes of the husband then his recourse should only be a divorce.

How can grandparents have any standing in this when their daughter in all likelihood would be emancipated? Either they are or they are not.

Women need to stand outside the capitol with pig balls held high. Some of the women of these legislators need to do the same in the bedroom.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

23 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

PA "Women's right to know Act" would place print out of ultrasound in patient's medical records [View all] Liberal_in_LA Feb 2012 OP

Doomsday button has been pushed BumRushDaShow Feb 2012 #1

But it's the RW that accuses Obama of telling doctors how to practice their profession. nanabugg Feb 2012 #23

Heinous. Absolutely Heinous. The title of the bill makes me want to vomit. n/t Avalux Feb 2012 #2

Unbelievable. We're going back to the dark ages. nt sufrommich Feb 2012 #3

Can anyone confirm if this statement by the bill's sponsor is true? PA Democrat Feb 2012 #4

NO way in hell. She's lying. Avalux Feb 2012 #5

That's what I thought. PA Democrat Feb 2012 #6

Looks like the bill's sponsor is a one woman anti-choice crusade. PA Democrat Feb 2012 #7

You know, we own property in Warren County and pay quite a bit of property taxes there. blue neen Feb 2012 #9

There is a petition, if you are interested in expressing your disapproval. Link inside: femmocrat Feb 2012 #8

What does our deranged Governor, Tom "The Nimrod" Corbett have to say about this? blue neen Feb 2012 #10

I don't think he is suicidal enough to sign it BumRushDaShow Feb 2012 #11

Everything else Corbett has signed has been pretty damn stupid. blue neen Feb 2012 #13

Yep, the stupid runs deep with Corbett. PA Democrat Feb 2012 #14

Unbelievable!!! Sparkly Feb 2012 #12

"We're not worthy!" We're not worthy!" blue neen Feb 2012 #18

I can't say what I would like to do to these regressive assholes Matariki Feb 2012 #15

Can someone please propose a Women's Right To Kick Some Republican Nutz Act Matariki Feb 2012 #16

Back to the kitchen with you - and take off your shoes! salin Feb 2012 #17

They need to attack this legislation piece by piece. LiberalFighter Feb 2012 #19

It seems that this is in direct violation of the federal HIPAA act. blue neen Feb 2012 #20

A transvaginal sonogram law has already been passed in Texas derby378 Feb 2012 #21

Among other things, it's a repellent abuse of Medicine. DirkGently Feb 2012 #22