Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
Fri Sep 20, 2013, 04:37 PM Sep 2013

Dear DU progressives: journalist shield laws are a good, not unconstitutional fascism [View all]

You certainly shouldn't take my word for it. Take the word of free press advocates. Like the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press:

About the Reporters Committee

Founded in 1970, the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press offers free legal support to thousands of working journalists and media lawyers each year. It is a leader in the fight against persistent efforts by government officials to impede the release of public information, whether by withholding documents or threatening reporters with jail. In addition to its 24/7 Legal Defense Hotline, the Reporters Committee conducts cutting-edge legal research, publishes handbooks and guides on media law issues, files frequent friend-of-the-court legal briefs and offers challenging fellowships and internships for young lawyers and journalists. For more information, go to www.rcfp.org, or follow us on Twitter @rcfp.


Here's what they have to say about the current federal shield law being proposed, (The Free Flowing Information Act):

Reporters Committee statement on shield bill
Press Release | September 12, 2013
Reporters Committee statement on shield bill
The U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee today passed the Free Flow of Information Act of 2013. Our statement:

We are pleased to see that the Judiciary Committee passed this bill. It goes a long way toward ensuring that reporters will be protected from subpoenas for their confidential information and sources. It's not a perfect bill, but it tries to cover a broad array of reporters. While it is not as inclusive as we would like, it is not nearly as limited in that area as previous attempts at a federal shield law have been.

It still is important that we work with Congress and the administration to make sure journalists' records are not scooped up in broad surveillance programs, and that Justice Department attorneys respect the rights of reporters, but today's action is a significant step in the right direction.



http://www.rcfp.org/reporters-committee-statement-shield-bill

Those who tell you that the federal law is about licensing or controlling or licensing or restricting journalists are either ignorant or liars. It's about making sure that overzealous federal prosecutors can't strong-arm journalists like Holder's DOJ has done to James Risen.

33 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why did you start your own thread on this? enlightenment Sep 2013 #1
Did you object to the thread where they called for banning anyone who favors geek tragedy Sep 2013 #4
No, why would I? That was the original thread on the topic, as far as I know. enlightenment Sep 2013 #9
There was another thread calling it Orwellian and a threat to freedom etc. geek tragedy Sep 2013 #10
I'm aware of the thread. I had just been reading it enlightenment Sep 2013 #11
The Orwellian thread person is merely confused. geek tragedy Sep 2013 #12
Look, I'm really not into enlightenment Sep 2013 #13
To dispute baseless hysteria? Something that should be done sufrommich Sep 2013 #24
I disagree. enlightenment Sep 2013 #28
I'm a bit confused by the OP title 1000words Sep 2013 #2
DU is not solely comprised of progressives. geek tragedy Sep 2013 #3
Majority are progressive. Minority are Reagan Democrats leftstreet Sep 2013 #5
Reagan Democrats are socially conservative, old, white, uneducated. nt geek tragedy Sep 2013 #8
Wrong. What a bigoted thing to say leftstreet Sep 2013 #18
So now you're accusing the truth of being bigoted. geek tragedy Sep 2013 #19
Was that point going to be lost on the not-so progressive members of DU? 1000words Sep 2013 #6
Says a lot, doesn't it? LondonReign2 Sep 2013 #25
Don't spoil their fun! Whisp Sep 2013 #7
This Shield Law is NOT all good... FirstLight Sep 2013 #14
Your last sentence is paranoid nonsense. geek tragedy Sep 2013 #15
i never said anything about gulags FirstLight Sep 2013 #16
The bill extends freedom of the press, it doesn't restrict it. nt geek tragedy Sep 2013 #17
Charles P. Pierce begs to differ. WilliamPitt Sep 2013 #20
I'll take legal analysis and history over his conspiracy theory. geek tragedy Sep 2013 #21
Most of your "rebuttal" is character assassination 1000words Sep 2013 #22
Pierce's article is basically character assassination geek tragedy Sep 2013 #23
Well, think of it like other laws designed to limit the scope of other amendments The Straight Story Sep 2013 #33
Silly me, I thought the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution WAS the "shield law". scarletwoman Sep 2013 #26
The first amendment doesn't protect journalists geek tragedy Sep 2013 #27
Twisted logic. If someone wants to talk to a journalist, the journalist has the right to print scarletwoman Sep 2013 #29
That is reality as it exists today. Doesn't make geek tragedy Sep 2013 #31
I'm opposed to this law; I think it will do more harm than good. alarimer Sep 2013 #30
Since 1896, when the first shield law was passed. geek tragedy Sep 2013 #32
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Dear DU progressives: jo...