General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: FBI calls half of populace with 9/11 doubts potential terrorists [View all]sulphurdunn
(6,891 posts)in depth or clearly about 911 beyond what wit ls required for mockery. But you should be able to remember the chronology of the attack: Plane strikes building, huge fireball. Remember that? Then lots and lots of very black smoke. Remember that? Huge fireball means nearly all of the aviation fuel was ignited upon impact, after which relatively low temperature fire that produced all that black smoke continued to burn flammables that were not consumed in the initial explosions. It would make as much sense for Popsicle to have rained down as for those building to have collapsed either from fire or from structural damage based sorely upon inferences drawn from computer models. Did you ever wonder why the evidence that would have proven beyond a reasonable doubt what brought down those building was removed before forensic tests could be performed? That's not an oops! sort of oversight. That is not to say they did not collapse as has been inferred, but it does say that the official explanation is not self-evident and a lot of questions about that day have not been addressed that should be.