Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pnwest

(3,467 posts)
50. Who gives a fuck about your "taste"?
Mon Oct 21, 2013, 01:26 PM
Oct 2013

No one was asking your rating on these women's desirability. The topic is kudos for using normal, everyday body types to model clothing to normal, everyday women. There are a lot more of us in this company's demographic than size zero models.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

They also need to use some older models SheilaT Oct 2013 #1
I agree! redstatebluegirl Oct 2013 #2
Elastic waist pipi_k Oct 2013 #5
I can't afford to buy clothes anymore cali Oct 2013 #9
HAHAHA! Rainngirl Oct 2013 #76
They actually need to design clothing for the variety of larger body types - Ms. Toad Oct 2013 #77
I'd like to see some classic styles, and not just "fad" clothing targeted to very young women. winter is coming Oct 2013 #59
Skin cream ads are so funny - as if those twenty-year-olds have wrinkles in the first place! polichick Oct 2013 #68
I always end up cursing pipi_k Oct 2013 #3
What irritates me ... Myrina Oct 2013 #24
Do you find pipi_k Oct 2013 #82
Yes but I figured it was because Myrina Oct 2013 #94
Have you looked at so-called "wide calf" boots? tblue37 Oct 2013 #96
I have these u4ic Oct 2013 #111
Oooh, those ARE cute! Myrina Oct 2013 #113
You're welcome! u4ic Oct 2013 #114
The woman on the left looks normal weight fitman Oct 2013 #4
I think that is part of the problem Marrah_G Oct 2013 #6
You have to be kidding me fitman Oct 2013 #13
Hell. The one on the left might have even been considered... bunnies Oct 2013 #31
Heavy? Only compared to Twiggy, who was pnwmom Oct 2013 #42
I suppose that when I think about the 70's... bunnies Oct 2013 #46
Clothing sizes aren't what they used to be - so true! CrispyQ Oct 2013 #88
Yes! bunnies Oct 2013 #99
It's called "vanity sizing." That's what allowed a still overweight tblue37 Oct 2013 #97
Is that what its called? bunnies Oct 2013 #100
Yep. So do I. nt tblue37 Oct 2013 #102
Try buying patterns and sewing your own... Ms. Toad Oct 2013 #103
Youre so right. bunnies Oct 2013 #108
"nearly all looked (like) the one on the left" -- bullshit. Gormy Cuss Oct 2013 #54
I was referring to her general weight fitman Oct 2013 #57
and your memory is faulty when it comes to shape Gormy Cuss Oct 2013 #58
What a sexist comment fitman Oct 2013 #61
No, you said the shape was typical. Gormy Cuss Oct 2013 #65
I used the word normal, not typical fitman Oct 2013 #67
I guess you're taking this too seriously. Gormy Cuss Oct 2013 #70
See polichick's comment fitman Oct 2013 #71
I agree with you - when I was growing up in the 70s more women did look... polichick Oct 2013 #66
Thank You Please tell that to poster Gormy Cuss fitman Oct 2013 #69
There were also not nearly the number of overweight kids when we were younger. CrispyQ Oct 2013 #89
No, larger women were there, alright... no name no slogan Oct 2013 #116
Men are also broken down to their looks just as much as women fitman Oct 2013 #15
if you don't believe men aren't objectified as much or more than women tillikum Oct 2013 #21
I agree with you 100% fitman Oct 2013 #23
all good. im not talking about hitting on you, im talking straight sexual assault. tillikum Oct 2013 #27
You must have a face of a god or one heck of a party you are going to fitman Oct 2013 #29
lol. not really. i get told i'm pretty masculine looking though *shrug*. tillikum Oct 2013 #37
You two PasadenaTrudy Oct 2013 #41
im a giver by nature so...you're welcome! tillikum Oct 2013 #44
Me too! nolabear Oct 2013 #87
Just look at the magazine rack Nevernose Oct 2013 #86
The woman on the left looks perfectly normal to me. RedCappedBandit Oct 2013 #19
Here's what a size 0 model looks like: sinkingfeeling Oct 2013 #20
That is foul. Myrina Oct 2013 #25
O_o Triana Oct 2013 #35
This is what you look like after getting out of an NSA prison. L0oniX Oct 2013 #39
So sad! polichick Oct 2013 #72
She looks like a walking skeleton, and Halloween is coming up. GreenStormCloud Oct 2013 #95
She's probably a 5' 10" size 0; a 5' 4" size 0 would look different FarCenter Oct 2013 #119
She's bigger than my wife NoOneMan Oct 2013 #52
They both look normal weight to me, and to most people, I would imagine. Quantess Oct 2013 #120
Yah, skin and bones... pipi_k Oct 2013 #12
I don't know. Xyzse Oct 2013 #28
That's what I thought. Woman on the left is NOT a "size 0". She may be a size 6, 8 or 10. n/t Triana Oct 2013 #30
I think the disconnect comes from the clothing manufacturers... bunnies Oct 2013 #33
No doubt. I'm a about that size too (4,5,6) Triana Oct 2013 #34
exactly. bunnies Oct 2013 #40
Who gives a fuck about your "taste"? pnwest Oct 2013 #50
Thank you for saying what I was thinking! blue neen Oct 2013 #64
I was bumping around the comments and my comment fitman Oct 2013 #93
"Normal" is not a term that is applicable. Both these women look fine to me. uppityperson Oct 2013 #74
I think the one on the right is just closer. Warren DeMontague Oct 2013 #78
My thought, as well. n/t Ms. Toad Oct 2013 #104
The one on the right looks luscious. roody Oct 2013 #90
The Models are both beautiful in their own right. Even though each person has the right... BlueJazz Oct 2013 #7
Two beautiful women! JNelson6563 Oct 2013 #8
Yeah, the one on the our right is absolutely amazing. Vashta Nerada Oct 2013 #10
I'm surprised no one noticed the size-ism in the photo Bunnahabhain Oct 2013 #11
About the large purse pipi_k Oct 2013 #14
The point is Bunnahabhain Oct 2013 #17
Not sure that I understand the staging of that photo out of its original context KurtNYC Oct 2013 #22
you might be over-analyzing the graphic in OP. the model on the right is SELLING more items. KittyWampus Oct 2013 #43
I went and looked at the pics in the link Bunnahabhain Oct 2013 #45
I'm also a bit surprised at the staging of the photo enlightenment Oct 2013 #18
No problem with lady on right. Wrap? Don't need no stinking wrap! Eleanors38 Oct 2013 #26
Having women of many body sizes is difficult makes production much more difficult AngryAmish Oct 2013 #16
As a woman who wears a size 18 JoDog Oct 2013 #32
Over wieght is the new normal in the US? Ask a doctor what normal weight is for your size. L0oniX Oct 2013 #36
A lot depends if you are a endomorph, ectomorph etc fitman Oct 2013 #47
Point is that it should be your doctor that tells you ...not some model picture. L0oniX Oct 2013 #49
There is no such thing as endomorph, ectomorph AngryAmish Oct 2013 #83
I was not referring to personality etc-was not even part of the conversation fitman Oct 2013 #84
Bingo! It's all a byproduct of the fantasy world that Americans live in. Egalitarian Thug Oct 2013 #55
This message was self-deleted by its author polichick Oct 2013 #75
According to the BMI - Ms. Toad Oct 2013 #105
Always made sense to me treestar Oct 2013 #38
the irony of size zero... Javaman Oct 2013 #48
what the hell is "size zero?" Blue_Tires Oct 2013 #51
I think Olive Oyl probably wears a zero. n/t Cleita Oct 2013 #56
It is like having a guitar amp that goes to 11 KurtNYC Oct 2013 #79
brilliant... Blue_Tires Oct 2013 #80
"So why not just, y'know, make Size 2 smaller?" nomorenomore08 Oct 2013 #107
After my husband died, I gained weight until I became Cleita Oct 2013 #53
And on Project Runway, when they have a challenge with real sized women, CrispyQ Oct 2013 #91
I remember that guy. Cleita Oct 2013 #92
I don't watch Project Runway but I remember seeing an ad for the show and the "designer" Number23 Oct 2013 #98
Lots of catalogs coming to our house, since my wife orders MineralMan Oct 2013 #60
1) If true, then the problem would have fixed itself cthulu2016 Oct 2013 #62
They represent a fantasy LittleBlue Oct 2013 #63
That was CW but consumer research shows that sales increase when KurtNYC Oct 2013 #81
the one on the right seems to have most of her weight in the thigh and chest areas JI7 Oct 2013 #112
In Hollywood (and some other places), women have breasts like the woman on the right... polichick Oct 2013 #73
k&r Beautiful! idwiyo Oct 2013 #85
The author fails to understand the purpose and messaging of glamour advertising... Demo_Chris Oct 2013 #101
...and for some designers, it's both physical apperance and socio-economics Earth_First Oct 2013 #106
This op reminds me DonCoquixote Oct 2013 #109
i'm 72. my first job in '58 was in the garment center. DesertFlower Oct 2013 #110
Remember sample shoes? SoCalDem Oct 2013 #118
lol. my mom was a size 5. DesertFlower Oct 2013 #121
I'll take the one on the right, thanks n/t JesterCS Oct 2013 #115
The one on the left (if she is the zero) would probably have been a sz 10 in my youth SoCalDem Oct 2013 #117
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What if using size zero m...»Reply #50