Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

proverbialwisdom

(4,959 posts)

3. Pallone hysterically blocked a perfectly reasonable line of questioning.

Reply to Dwayne Hicks (Original post)

Thu Oct 24, 2013, 12:11 PM

Oct 2013

Specifically, some 'teabagger' demanded an explanation for the required consent during the application process to "no reasonable expectation of privacy.' Really?

Earlier, some 'teabagger' counted the number of words in the ACA - over 11 billion and wondered why. So do I.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Frank Pallone: I will not yield to this monkey court! [View all] Dwayne Hicks Oct 2013 OP

And this is why JustAnotherGen Oct 2013 #1

Pallone is right on the mark Zambero Oct 2013 #2

Pallone hysterically blocked a perfectly reasonable line of questioning. proverbialwisdom Oct 2013 #3

What? Dwayne Hicks Oct 2013 #5

I'd like the question answered in full and any deficiencies fixed ASAP. Do you claim perfection? nt proverbialwisdom Oct 2013 #6

Your concern is noted. truebluegreen Oct 2013 #8

No one is claiming perfection. Dwayne Hicks Oct 2013 #9

As to your second question, for a law as sweeping as the ACA to function truebluegreen Oct 2013 #7

The bill has ~1990 pages, large font, large margins ... 11 billion words, hardly. JoePhilly Oct 2013 #11

I've read the ACA ... that word count is nonsense and only a fool would believe it. JoePhilly Oct 2013 #10

Too bad Dwayne Hicks Oct 2013 #4