Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Dear Josh Marshall: Please explain which allied countries are spying on which "US Leaders" [View all]ProSense
(116,464 posts)2. Here's some good information.
Which Other Countries Are In Bed With The NSA?
By Hayes Brown
With three of their partners signal intelligence collection programs revealed, its only a matter of time before all eyes turn to two of the most seemingly innocuous members of the world stage: Canada and New Zealand.
<...>
Australia has recently found itself the most recent target of Snowdens cache of documents. Just days ago, the land down unders participation in the NSAs intelligence gathering was splashed across headlines. In the pages of Brazils O Globo newspaper, Glenn Greenwald one journalist who originally received the NSA documents from Snowden catalogued the existence of a series of four NSA listening stations throughout Australia.
What the United States, United Kingdom, and Australia all have in common is joint membership in an organization known colloquially as The Five Eyes. In a 1943 agreement not even officially acknowledged until 2005 and declassified in 2010 the U.S. and Britain agreed to share signal intelligence between themselves and the Dominions of Canada, New Zealand, and Australia. Under the terms of the pact, formally known as the UKUSA Agreement, electronic information collected in the course of espionage can be passed freely among themselves, circumventing the normal controls against foreign sharing that intelligence usually possesses.
For those keeping track, that still leaves two of the Five Eyes participation remaining relatively concealed or at least not the focus of a leak. Thus far, the Communications Security Establishment Canada (CSEC) and New Zealands Government Communications Security Bureau have managed to avoid major scrutiny or revelations about the programs that they operate. Given the new interest in revealing legal cooperation in intelligence sharing, however, its not hard to guess that they might be next.
- more -
http://thinkprogress.org/security/2013/07/10/2276191/snowden-five-eyes/
By Hayes Brown
With three of their partners signal intelligence collection programs revealed, its only a matter of time before all eyes turn to two of the most seemingly innocuous members of the world stage: Canada and New Zealand.
<...>
Australia has recently found itself the most recent target of Snowdens cache of documents. Just days ago, the land down unders participation in the NSAs intelligence gathering was splashed across headlines. In the pages of Brazils O Globo newspaper, Glenn Greenwald one journalist who originally received the NSA documents from Snowden catalogued the existence of a series of four NSA listening stations throughout Australia.
What the United States, United Kingdom, and Australia all have in common is joint membership in an organization known colloquially as The Five Eyes. In a 1943 agreement not even officially acknowledged until 2005 and declassified in 2010 the U.S. and Britain agreed to share signal intelligence between themselves and the Dominions of Canada, New Zealand, and Australia. Under the terms of the pact, formally known as the UKUSA Agreement, electronic information collected in the course of espionage can be passed freely among themselves, circumventing the normal controls against foreign sharing that intelligence usually possesses.
For those keeping track, that still leaves two of the Five Eyes participation remaining relatively concealed or at least not the focus of a leak. Thus far, the Communications Security Establishment Canada (CSEC) and New Zealands Government Communications Security Bureau have managed to avoid major scrutiny or revelations about the programs that they operate. Given the new interest in revealing legal cooperation in intelligence sharing, however, its not hard to guess that they might be next.
- more -
http://thinkprogress.org/security/2013/07/10/2276191/snowden-five-eyes/
France, Germany And Brazil Have Surveillance Agencies Too
http://thinkprogress.org/security/2013/10/21/2807751/france-germany-brazil-surveillance/
Brazils Leader Asks Canada to Explain Its Spying
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/08/world/americas/brazil-leader-asks-canada-to-explain-its-spying.html
In Spy Uproar, Everyone Does It Just Wont Do
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/26/world/europe/in-spy-uproar-everyone-does-it-just-wont-do.html?_r=0&pagewanted=all
As I said here (http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023937555), it's interesting that this started in 2002 under Bush, and ended early in the Obama Presidency when it was discovered, but somehow it's just becoming an issue. Wonder why?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
59 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Dear Josh Marshall: Please explain which allied countries are spying on which "US Leaders" [View all]
Shampoyeto
Oct 2013
OP
I disagree. TPM has pretty in-depth reporting and seems to get it right most of the time.
OregonBlue
Oct 2013
#52
You telling us this might violate your security agreement and clearance
nadinbrzezinski
Oct 2013
#13
No, this is public knowledge and published in standard security training.... nothing secrety.
Adrahil
Oct 2013
#14
Damn! Usually you have to piss someone off more than this to be put on the prized Iggy List!
randome
Oct 2013
#23
<Shrug> Some people only want to hear people who agree with them on everything. nt
Adrahil
Oct 2013
#57
Josh, you're good at covering economic issues, so go ahead and make stuff up about spying
Shampoyeto
Oct 2013
#24
It was a 3 paragraph blurb with his by-line, not a story with facts and figures.
randome
Oct 2013
#31
I edited my original post. The article is headlined 'TPM Editor's Blog'. It's his opinion.
randome
Oct 2013
#40
yes, on twitter. i was gonna comment under his article, but surprise surprise
Shampoyeto
Oct 2013
#34
I believe there is an email for the publication to which concerns may be made.
LanternWaste
Oct 2013
#41
After WWII and the Cold War, no competent intelligence service would wait until a conflict broke out
struggle4progress
Oct 2013
#38