General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Young women, are you upset you'll have to pay for Viagra [View all]CreekDog
(46,192 posts)It was to talk about price hikes for insurance policies for men, but put those increases adjacent to the reality that women were charged more for the same insurance, and despite being charged more, that insurance actually excluded a key piece of women's health care, beyond its exclusions for men.
The take home message was, the prices for men are going up because the coverage was totally inadequate and a joke really and also to equalize the prices for men and women, who should pay the same.
And almost all in the thread, save two men, and one clueless troll who i recommend not taking seriously, posted in support of women and men paying the same for health care, period.
Far from encouraging misandry, misogyny or anything else, it encouraged factual understanding of a real ACA issue and encouraged support of non-discriminatory ways of fixing it.
As for you, you simply made a caricature of my post and have practically accused me of saying what I never said nor intended.