Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

NuclearDem

(16,184 posts)
31. Well, I checked, and this doesn't seem to be a reincarnation of michigandemStateBlues.
Wed Oct 30, 2013, 02:52 PM
Oct 2013

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

you're number 2 point is wrong gopiscrap Oct 2013 #1
oh gosh what a typo lmao... thanks!! johnnyrak88 Oct 2013 #5
not a problem I knew what you meant, but thought that you should fix gopiscrap Oct 2013 #8
BTW welcome to DU gopiscrap Oct 2013 #9
hey thanks! nt johnnyrak88 Oct 2013 #14
you're welcome hope we call learn from each other gopiscrap Oct 2013 #16
Replace 2016 with 2008, and you get exactly what people were saying back then. jeff47 Oct 2013 #2
Except that Hillary 2016 has Hillary 2008 as a comparison point. JoePhilly Oct 2013 #43
Who doesn't love someone leftynyc Oct 2013 #54
We got corporate candidate #2. polichick Oct 2013 #59
So how do the Dems raise $1 billion without corporate funds? Be Dem PC and tell them to go ahead libdem4life Oct 2013 #95
The only thing I can think of is if people got behind a candidate and funded... polichick Oct 2013 #106
Who would even run? They can't work, family suffers, and to depend on 63 million voters to each libdem4life Oct 2013 #125
These days I can feel depressed about the state of our country... polichick Oct 2013 #126
Ummm...Reagan was president for the majority of the 80's; the 90's was Clinton's era. nt LaydeeBug Oct 2013 #3
I fixed it sorry thanks nt johnnyrak88 Oct 2013 #7
Raygun was the 80s president. HappyMe Oct 2013 #4
Spandan, is that you? NuclearDem Oct 2013 #6
This message was self-deleted by its author Rex Oct 2013 #30
if clinton gets someting done mshasta Oct 2013 #10
I see it more like Hillary will have a lot of healing to do after 2016. nt johnnyrak88 Oct 2013 #11
golly, this sure does remind me of what some here said in 2006. cali Oct 2013 #12
I'll say: Smarmie Doofus Oct 2013 #13
and if a fair portion of johnnyrak88 Oct 2013 #15
Given her support of TPP, that's likely. NuclearDem Oct 2013 #18
IMO this goes awry just after "1)" HereSince1628 Oct 2013 #17
Last time, Hillary got 17+ million votes in the Primary season brooklynite Oct 2013 #20
Yes, her support WAS largely from "new democrats", "3rd wayers" HereSince1628 Oct 2013 #26
It makes no sense to add primary "votes" karynnj Oct 2013 #53
I think her base of support will be massive johnnyrak88 Oct 2013 #21
You are most certainly encouraged to have an opinion HereSince1628 Oct 2013 #25
Yeah! It will be awesome to have them BOTH back in the White house . Auntie Bush Oct 2013 #37
That's one of my lessor problems, but I'll admit it...I have very little respect for BC HereSince1628 Oct 2013 #44
Just another pro-war, 3rd Way, corporatist, ambitious, pol. Tierra_y_Libertad Oct 2013 #19
exactly my take pangaia Oct 2013 #80
It's an easy win for the Democratic party, but.... davidn3600 Oct 2013 #22
maybe... johnnyrak88 Oct 2013 #27
no DonCoquixote Oct 2013 #109
*snooorree* *snoooooooooreee* Buddha_of_Wisdom Oct 2013 #23
So, let me see if I've got this straight: NuclearDem Oct 2013 #24
+1 Chan790 Oct 2013 #28
Or me. pangaia Oct 2013 #81
+1 Marr Oct 2013 #111
Ding, ding, ding. We have a winner. Scuba Oct 2013 #118
Another Spandanish post...yawn. Rex Oct 2013 #29
Well, I checked, and this doesn't seem to be a reincarnation of michigandemStateBlues. NuclearDem Oct 2013 #31
Okay kewl, just another hippie puncher then. Rex Oct 2013 #32
Hillary is a hippie? wuh? n/t Whisp Oct 2013 #41
SO you are saying that the OP is Hillary? Rex Oct 2013 #42
I have no idea who the punched hippies are supposed to be here... Whisp Oct 2013 #45
I won't. Maybe I am the confused one. Rex Oct 2013 #48
I'm not sure who I'll be supporting. Whisp Oct 2013 #49
Warren would make a hell of a good VP. Rex Oct 2013 #50
Yes, Warren would be a good VP but Auntie Bush Oct 2013 #71
80-20 G4A Capt. Obvious Oct 2013 #33
I put money on AllINeedIsBlueGrassmichigandeniac. NuclearDem Oct 2013 #34
You can add... Oilwellian Oct 2013 #88
Regarding #4 - nope. They'll be just as nuts with Hillary. Eventually, just Pirate Smile Oct 2013 #35
About #2. Whisp Oct 2013 #36
IMO youre wrong on 1 thru 4 bowens43 Oct 2013 #38
They'll Live BKH70041 Oct 2013 #39
Viable is Pragmatic! bobduca Oct 2013 #122
I think you're 1 for 5 lumberjack_jeff Oct 2013 #40
She'll win because she's already proved she can do the job as well, or better, JoePhilly Oct 2013 #46
Yes if the 90s taught us nothing else Union Scribe Oct 2013 #47
I guess that's why the entire Republican Party united to impeach him? - Only the second impeachment Douglas Carpenter Oct 2013 #66
And we learned from 2008 that 90% of Dems want Hillary. winter is coming Oct 2013 #92
Republican Law makers refused to work with Bill Clinton Agnosticsherbet Oct 2013 #51
I doubt that she will run. TheCowsCameHome Oct 2013 #52
silly johnnyrak88 Oct 2013 #57
Hillary is all over facebook where she has a huge following. Agnosticsherbet Oct 2013 #69
"Hillary is in it to win it." winter is coming Oct 2013 #91
People are judged by their food on cooking shows, not on how money moves opinion Agnosticsherbet Oct 2013 #123
Since that girl was 5 years old she wanted to be President. She's running. johnlucas Oct 2013 #72
"The left" is not in a mood to just accept another corporate Dem... polichick Oct 2013 #55
that is entirely possible and the status quo will prevail. Wealth will continue to be increasingly Douglas Carpenter Oct 2013 #56
Don't forget the continued failure to take significant action on climate change... antigone382 Oct 2013 #77
And Ted will cruz to an agonizing defeat Blue Owl Oct 2013 #58
"Republican lawmakers will work with Hillary Clinton" Cali_Democrat Oct 2013 #60
You beat me to it. -nt- DireStrike Oct 2013 #87
Shhhh....just let it happen.....don't fight it Z_California Oct 2013 #61
So much, so wrong.... Xithras Oct 2013 #62
i agree MFM008 Oct 2013 #63
Can we get through 2014 first? Vashta Nerada Oct 2013 #64
Hillary is definitely less evil than Ted Cruz. Nye Bevan Oct 2013 #74
Ted Cruz won't be the Republican nominee. Vashta Nerada Oct 2013 #78
Haha. That was funny. TheCowsCameHome Oct 2013 #85
I think she's the favourite going in watch the sky Oct 2013 #65
Same argument heard in 2007. How'd that turn out again? AtomicKitten Oct 2013 #67
She got more votes than Obama? brooklynite Oct 2013 #79
No, she didn't. AtomicKitten Oct 2013 #108
The Green Papers say otherwise. joshcryer Oct 2013 #113
"conditions" ?????? AtomicKitten Oct 2013 #124
Her administration would be prosperous for the 1% that's for sure. liberal_at_heart Oct 2013 #68
And without me. pangaia Oct 2013 #83
Count me in with you n/t dflprincess Oct 2013 #97
I am not optimistic with republicans working with any Democratic President. bluestate10 Oct 2013 #70
Is there something in the water today? marmar Oct 2013 #73
It's hard to not laugh out loud when I read that Republicans would vote for Hillary because Bluenorthwest Oct 2013 #75
Really. What is this shit? The republicans would work with the woman Nay Oct 2013 #90
Oh for the love of Graham4Anything BeyondGeography Oct 2013 #76
You can say that again.......... davidpdx Oct 2013 #115
Ok Hillary Clinton and Elizabeth Warren vs. Rand Paul and Paul Ryan. Initech Oct 2013 #82
You got something wrong. It won't be 'some' on the Left, it will be a sabrina 1 Oct 2013 #84
++++++ fadedrose Oct 2013 #93
She also supports the TPP. Deal breaker. No more corporate democrats. liberal_at_heart Oct 2013 #94
"4) Republican lawmakers will work with Hillary Clinton." HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA DireStrike Oct 2013 #86
gosh, if its "prosperous and positive" how can anyone be upset? bobduca Oct 2013 #89
If Howard Dean runs, I'm voting for him Lifelong Dem Oct 2013 #96
"Americans over 40 remember the Clinton presidency fondly" dflprincess Oct 2013 #98
Let's take it a little more slowly. Beacool Oct 2013 #99
Awesome prediction! jsr Oct 2013 #100
I don't think its a lock that she wins. mr_liberal Oct 2013 #101
Agree with some of this, disagree with other bits, but: TDale313 Oct 2013 #102
Did I wake up in 2008? Recursion Oct 2013 #103
ROFL davidpdx Oct 2013 #116
Jumped the shark at 4. Maybe 3 quakerboy Oct 2013 #104
or DonCoquixote Oct 2013 #105
Just don't feel the love avaistheone1 Oct 2013 #107
This early sales campaign is really turning people off, imho. Marr Oct 2013 #110
Republicans don't like Hillary or Bill. JVS Oct 2013 #112
You know what Republicans love even more? Power. nyquil_man Oct 2013 #114
This breaking news just in davidpdx Oct 2013 #117
Just to be realistic BootinUp Oct 2013 #119
I'm not opposed to a second Clinton presidency RFKHumphreyObama Oct 2013 #120
G4A? idwiyo Oct 2013 #121
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»How Hillary will cruise t...»Reply #31