Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(116,464 posts)

6. That's

Mon Dec 19, 2011, 12:29 AM

Dec 2011

"actually there was a bit of a jump for Mondale in July which is when that rate would have been reported."

...a bit of a stretch isn't it?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

19 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

This was the month by month unemployment rate from nov 83 to nov 84 [View all] dsc Dec 2011 OP

Well, ProSense Dec 2011 #1

It could well be worse dsc Dec 2011 #2

That was back in the days when we still made stuff pscot Dec 2011 #3

The ProSense Dec 2011 #4

actually there was a bit of a jump for Mondale in July dsc Dec 2011 #5

That's ProSense Dec 2011 #6

He had a 15 point jump dsc Dec 2011 #7

OK ProSense Dec 2011 #8

Well, ProSense Dec 2011 #10

The trend is actually flat Yo_Mama Dec 2011 #13

It ProSense Dec 2011 #14

I don't think that graph means what you say it means Yo_Mama Dec 2011 #17

Yeah - and there's hidden unemployment Yo_Mama Dec 2011 #11

If it's Romney, you're absolutely right. boxman15 Dec 2011 #12

Didn't Reagan borrow and spend his way out of that recession? JDPriestly Dec 2011 #15

that and he cut interest rates hugely dsc Dec 2011 #18

I completely disagree with you. bluestate10 Dec 2011 #19