Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

deurbano

(2,984 posts)
13. Michael Hastings & Lara Logan illustrate difference between afflicting & serving powerful
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 10:51 PM
Nov 2013

MONDAY, JUN 28, 2010 04:29 AM PDT
The Two Poles of Journalism
Michael Hastings and Lara Logan illustrate the difference between afflicting and serving the powerful
BY GLENN GREENWALD

http://www.salon.com/2010/06/28/journalism_9/

<<With his Rolling Stone article on Gen. McChrystal, Michael Hastings has become both the personification of, and spokesperson for, Real Journalism, and as a result, has provoked intense animosity from establishment-serving “reporters” everywhere. He apparently committed the gravest sin: he exposed and embarrassed rather than flattered and protected a powerful government official, and in our upside-down media culture, doing that is a sign of irresponsibility rather than fulfillment of the basic journalistic function. As Barrett Brown notes in this excellent defense, Hastings in 2008 did to the establishment media what he did to Gen. McChyrstal — exposed what they do and how they think by writing the truth — after he quit Newsweek (where he was the Baghdad correspondent) and wrote a damning exposé about how the media distorts war coverage. As Brown put it: “Hastings ensured that he would never be trusted by the establishment media ever again.”

Yesterday, Hastings was interviewed on CNN’s Reliable Sources about the criticisms he has received from media figures over his article, and that was followed by a segment with CBS’ Lara Logan, who lambasted him. I really recommend watching these two segments (video below), as they illustrate the two poles of journalism: those who view their role as exposing the relevant secrets of the powerful (Hastings) and those who view their role as protecting those secrets and serving the interests of those officials (Logan). Amazingly, Logan sounds like the most devoted member of McChyrstal’s P.R. staff or even his family: so furious is she that Hastings would publish an article that reflected negatively on this Fine, Great Man (whom she supposedly covers) – so devoted is she to the interests of this military official — that, at one point, she drops the neutral journalist mask and shows her Bill Kristol face, and actually spat: “Michael Hastings has never served his country the way McChrystal has.” >>

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

... the man identified in the report as Morgan Jones... real name was confirmed as Dylan Davies... Tx4obama Nov 2013 #1
Lara Logan is a hardcore Neocon/rightwinger. geek tragedy Nov 2013 #2
She is. Lara Logan is deep, deep in the security complex. She is even married to bluestate10 Nov 2013 #3
i've always found her to be brave samsingh Nov 2013 #6
Lara Logan is not a neocon samsingh Nov 2013 #7
"Shoot ’em, bomb ’em, fuck ’em. They will kill your children.” geek tragedy Nov 2013 #16
i've read some more of her speeches and found them to be troubling samsingh Nov 2013 #19
Too bad. tblue Nov 2013 #34
Oh yeah - she openly admitted to currying favor with closeupready Nov 2013 #11
She's tough--served many dangerous assignments--but has gone off the deep end geek tragedy Nov 2013 #17
I view her as unprofessional. northoftheborder Nov 2013 #26
Michael Hastings & Lara Logan illustrate difference between afflicting & serving powerful deurbano Nov 2013 #13
so then no one lost their job? for airing something bogus? ejpoeta Nov 2013 #4
Fox lite. Scuba Nov 2013 #5
Dear 60 Minutes: Your shit smells like beautiful perfume Blue Owl Nov 2013 #8
R#16 & K n/t UTUSN Nov 2013 #9
I'm boycotting CBS News. Blue_In_AK Nov 2013 #10
It doesn't surprise me. Beacool Nov 2013 #12
60 Minutes lost 1 more viewer! B Calm Nov 2013 #14
Sadly, I expected nothing less. SchmerzImArsch Nov 2013 #15
Shame on the courts for ruling that a news org can force reporters to lie. grahamhgreen Nov 2013 #18
Haven't watched that BS show since mikeysnot Nov 2013 #20
Same here. Get news online, and perspective from DU! AAO Nov 2013 #37
Don Hewitt would be disgusted lpbk2713 Nov 2013 #21
The 4th estate have been given ctsnowman Nov 2013 #22
I really hadn't expected a retraction! CBS bought, sold & delivered! hue Nov 2013 #23
they really need to do a follow up Mikeystyle Nov 2013 #24
Isn't it... DirtyDawg Nov 2013 #25
I knew his story was bogus veganlush Nov 2013 #27
The 12-foot wall did it for me nt Link Speed Nov 2013 #28
we can no longer rely on our media to provide the truth or even both sides of a story. spanone Nov 2013 #29
60 minutes died PatrynXX Nov 2013 #30
Television News has lost its way Stainless Nov 2013 #31
Absolutely true about the sheep warrant46 Nov 2013 #36
K&R lillypaddle Nov 2013 #32
Hmmm, sounds like this things needs a boycott of their sponsors..... DeSwiss Nov 2013 #33
The M$M has a narrative to follow and has nothing to do with reporting Rex Nov 2013 #35
Seems CBS is whoring for Ken Cootchinelly. Rain Mcloud Nov 2013 #38
I noticed that, too. Hard to believe those 3 letters were representative!! JEFF9K Nov 2013 #39
Our nation turns its' lonely eyes to you Iwillnevergiveup Nov 2013 #40
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»So . . . a week after 60 ...»Reply #13