Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

el_bryanto

(11,804 posts)

12. It's Sedition up to 7:30 PM and after that it's Treason. nt

Reply to malaise (Reply #7)

Fri Nov 15, 2013, 01:08 PM

Nov 2013

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

41 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Petition Calls For Arresting And Charging Tea Party Republicans With Sedition [View all] dynasaw Nov 2013 OP

. flamin lib Nov 2013 #1

I'll pass... Cooley Hurd Nov 2013 #2

While this will go nowhere I disagree with you.... Swede Atlanta Nov 2013 #3

Go after them, then... Cooley Hurd Nov 2013 #5

then you should have no problem at all supplying that evidence cali Nov 2013 #8

Draft resisters openly fought the law during the Vietnam War period. former9thward Nov 2013 #11

these people are just as scary as the teabaggers. fuck 'em. cali Nov 2013 #4

Although the sedition laws do not apparently apply, The invlovement of the Koch brothers, & Adelsson bobalew Nov 2013 #6

Is planning a coup in public sedition or treason? malaise Nov 2013 #7

It's Sedition up to 7:30 PM and after that it's Treason. nt el_bryanto Nov 2013 #12

LOL malaise Nov 2013 #15

Proof that both sides of the political spectrum... NCTraveler Nov 2013 #9

yeah, but the right side has a fuck of a lot more of them. cali Nov 2013 #13

Correct on both counts, as usual. nt. NCTraveler Nov 2013 #17

Yes - there's no way that Republicans could ever use this expansion of the sedition law el_bryanto Nov 2013 #10

off with their heads cali Nov 2013 #18

I think two things el_bryanto Nov 2013 #20

that's an excellent point cali Nov 2013 #21

There will be a point sometime in the future, HijackedLabel Nov 2013 #14

Constitution be damned! Off with their heads! cali Nov 2013 #19

Thanks for putting words in my mouth. HijackedLabel Nov 2013 #23

Perhaps we could send them to camps! dairydog91 Nov 2013 #22

Who said anything about camps? nt HijackedLabel Nov 2013 #24

We have a system in place now, it's called voting seveneyes Nov 2013 #25

One way or another meant cutthroat politicking. HijackedLabel Nov 2013 #27

Probably because you said: Abq_Sarah Nov 2013 #34

right...that worked out great for us in 2000 noiretextatique Nov 2013 #40

this is a prime example of selective editing melm00se Nov 2013 #16

And "force" is a limited legal term. dairydog91 Nov 2013 #26

actually you forgot the word "or" part... VanillaRhapsody Nov 2013 #28

Please, not again. Ranchemp. Nov 2013 #29

You naysayers are missing a seldom-cited clause in the law Dreamer Tatum Nov 2013 #30

I'll sign it right now. louis-t Nov 2013 #31

Not this shit again. badtoworse Nov 2013 #32

While I agree the tea party and GOP are major asshats w/o the best interests of the country FSogol Nov 2013 #33

Take a civics class, please. tritsofme Nov 2013 #35

The easiest way to fix the problem Aerows Nov 2013 #36

If they didn't break any laws, then they have nothing to worry about right? Rex Nov 2013 #37

A Superawesome idea! Puzzledtraveller Nov 2013 #38

I think I'll pass. Captain Stern Nov 2013 #39

"What are we going to do tonight, Brain?" Coyotl Nov 2013 #41