Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Elizabeth Warren Isn’t Running For President, Top Financial Backer Tells Democrats [View all]Beacool
(30,511 posts)52. Wouldn't Treasury Secretary or Chairman of the Federal Reserve be more within her scope?
I think that she could kick butt in either post.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
64 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Elizabeth Warren Isn’t Running For President, Top Financial Backer Tells Democrats [View all]
WilliamPitt
Nov 2013
OP
I'm thinking about the 17 million Democrats who supported Hillary in 2008...
brooklynite
Nov 2013
#45
I was already sick of the engineered choices we had in the 2008 primaries...
cascadiance
Nov 2013
#57
I love Bernie. I would love to see Grayson talking about a run, too.
woo me with science
Nov 2013
#39
She signed the letter encouraging Hillary to run. Why are we talking about this? nt
onehandle
Nov 2013
#11
I think she realizes it would be tough in 2016 and wait and see who wins in 2016
joeybee12
Nov 2013
#24
Doesn't matter.. don't you see, you can just "recruit" her to run with MAGIC!
scheming daemons
Nov 2013
#22
I am going to wait until all the candidates that WANT to run announce....
scheming daemons
Nov 2013
#26
Interesting info, Will. But does that also mean you advocate not trying to find alternatives
BelgianMadCow
Nov 2013
#38
Why don't you offer us a case of these to get rid of the turds of both parties in DC now! n/t
cascadiance
Nov 2013
#60
Wouldn't Treasury Secretary or Chairman of the Federal Reserve be more within her scope?
Beacool
Nov 2013
#52
If we lose the Senate in 2014, what the hell does it matter? Nice to know DU's priorities are....
Tarheel_Dem
Nov 2013
#53
