General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Chomsky on Porn [View all]Kurska
(5,739 posts)Last edited Fri Nov 29, 2013, 11:32 PM - Edit history (1)
I don't know how anyone could read my post and think I meant to say anything other than that I believe the meaning of the first amendment is that every American has a sacred duty to find Chomsky and put a ball gag in his mouth.
By no means is it likely or even possible that I meant that I disagree with Chomsky's implication that porn is broken and can never be fixed (inferring it should probably be banned). Nor that I am saying it is hypocritical for other people who had stressed that wasn't what they were saying and were only talking about rape porn, to cheer him on when he says that. No, I clearly meant that I want to personally silence Chomsky and ensure that no one ever gets to hear what he has to say about porn again.
Disagreeing with what he said, MUST mean that I want to remove his ability to say it and that I want to prevent anyone else from sharing those words.
You did it buddy, you unraveled the mystery of my post. No one else could, but you alone have deciphered the cryptic meaning behind my words. It took you personally to bravely looked past what I actually wrote and find the god given truth behind my statements.
Congratulations!