Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Oh... Fucking... Barf !!! [View all]SpcMnky
(73 posts)20. I'd say we let them expose themselves, and then we win in a landslide
we survived the chimp, and we won big, everywhere.
This rightward drift, and excuses for it has been devastating to us... time for a CHANGE.
Worked for Obama!
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
46 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The question I have for you, is do we take a Democrat who votes with the party most of the time
madinmaryland
Dec 2013
#4
A teaklanner is one less vote for a Democratic Party Senate Majority Leader and ONE MORE VOTE
madinmaryland
Dec 2013
#21
I'd love to see a no-nonsense liberal primary him, or present a 3rd party challenge.
arcane1
Dec 2013
#13
I think it's obvious that DUs antipathy towards religion is what matters most.
el_bryanto
Dec 2013
#8
Let who expose themselves?? Republicans? If they do, they probably will win in a landslide.
madinmaryland
Dec 2013
#22
Blows my mind we even live in the same country with this guy's constituents.
RedCappedBandit
Dec 2013
#38