Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I don't get into these much, but it was NOT sexual harassment! [View all]seabeyond
(110,159 posts)87. but it was mroe than a kiss on the hand, you understadn that right? this is where the real battle
ended up on du. so many men wanted to keep it at merely a kiss on the hand. how can we be bothered. but... that was not the issue. it was kiss on mouth, face, unexpectedly, continuously, corralling her stopping her from playing.
jsut want to make sure we are on the same page.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
106 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
no he was not. amybe at first. but being repeatedly told to knock it off, took it beyond the
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#14
i have raised young boys. i am well aware of young boys behavior. one boy stopped. did not get
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#43
they did not label the child with sexual harassment. it went into a file that was
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#75
I'm not aiming the OP at "them". I'm aiming it at the idea altogether that it was sexual.
nolabear
Dec 2013
#78
i think they wanted to differentiate it from the other disciplinary behavior that is my point.
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#80
you know, that just was not a big deal to me. that is fine. spelling it out is fine. having a
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#84
yes. it could be because the adults around him, like those on the board are too busy going after the
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#77
ah... well. i kinda figure about what subject. pretty hard liner without a lot of leeway. that
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#95
oh oh oh. and a year? i am getting old. a year is a really long time ago. lol. i try to keep
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#96
Maybe, maybe not. Do you know what the male child had been exposed to? There could be influences
lostincalifornia
Dec 2013
#101
bad behavior-needing correction and discipline - I agree - but it is cuckoo to refer to a 6 year-old
Douglas Carpenter
Dec 2013
#7
Thankfully, most understand that and the hair on fire brigade are a very small minority
1000words
Dec 2013
#8
fire brigade? you were one of the ones yelling sexual predator. we were saying just what the OP is
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#15
Since a six year old would not be able to comprehend what 'sexual harrasment' means
Rex
Dec 2013
#10
I disagree. Sexual harassment has to have an element of sex about it. Assault is closer.
nolabear
Dec 2013
#67
i think that is pretty much what we have all been saying. none of this is new. people wanting to
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#13
and something else. not only was that little guy getting a break, the little guy was not even
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#17
they did not tell him he was sexually harassing. the talked to him about boundaries and
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#27
exactly. and that has been my beef. i am so fuckin all over protecting this kid and defending the
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#35
the school took the steps. talking to. time out. in school detention. then an out of school
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#24
Indeed, its another example of a bizarre fringey group not understanding their weird
quinnox
Dec 2013
#22
that would be the number of men that continually said it was boys being boys and no action should
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#25
bizarre fringey group not understanding their weird ideas are not what most normal people think
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#30
I used to minimize and trivialize people and groups by name calling when they didn't support my poin
LanternWaste
Dec 2013
#38
I think the only disagreement is whether the term "sexual harassment" makes sense
gollygee
Dec 2013
#28
not everyone agrees it needed discipline. a lot of men insisted nothing should be done.
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#32
it did not matter how many times it was drawn out for them. sexual predator, they yelled.
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#37
which this thread only reinforced. allowing them to come in and talk about reasonable, when it is
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#45
go at it haus. i am tired of totally fabricated arguments created to diss women. in absurdity.
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#56
i think many of us talked endlessly about a parents job teaching kids boundaries and reinforcing
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#59
and as a parent of 2 almost thru the system, i would so trust the schools. i have yet to find a
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#85
lol. a real pleasure to both agree and disagree respectfully. thank you. that is refreshing. nt
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#89
I hope you don't think I was doing that. I certainly believe sexual harassment happens.
nolabear
Dec 2013
#68
but it was mroe than a kiss on the hand, you understadn that right? this is where the real battle
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#87
At six, when I was told by parents and educators not to do thing, I would stop doing it.
LanternWaste
Dec 2013
#36
"Like most childish behaviors, he'll probably grow out of it.""administration being overzealous"
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#47
the school didnt give the kid sexual harassment. they talked to him in age appropriate language.
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#49
or from what we can see, the mother doesnt seem to think it is her job to teach it to her son. nt
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#64
It was repeated unwanted touching that made the little girl uncomfortable. It was sexual harassment.
liberal_at_heart
Dec 2013
#94
Calling the behavior of first graders "sexual harassment" diminishes the term.
lumberjack_jeff
Dec 2013
#102