Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: KHAN Academy: The future of education? [View all]NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)80. Say What? It's to sell PCs? Oh no you didn't!
Last edited Tue Mar 13, 2012, 10:01 AM - Edit history (1)
The Bill Gates conspiracy, eh?
First, we do NOT use PCs.
Nobody's selling anything, schools have computers, homes have computers, hell, kids have frakking smart phones that run better than computers.
No purchase required for flipping.
You're killin' me here with this theory.
Seriously, you mention a tutor. The flipped model provides time for peer support, the best kind.
Unless you think students are unteachable monsters who must have a strict master teacher who whips them into shape.
One thing about these education threads, one can always tell who does and who does not work with students in real life.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
97 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
"They don't know everything about this subject or everything I would teach them"
NYC_SKP
Mar 2012
#95
Well we use the principle of flipping yet have never been approached for marketing.
NYC_SKP
Mar 2012
#44
She rocks. I think a lot of people think computers are going to put teachers out of work.
NYC_SKP
Mar 2012
#21
That was a great segment on 60 Minutes. I made all of my kids come down and watch it so they
Pirate Smile
Mar 2012
#8
I saw that. It was pretty exciting and made so much sense. Like most innovations,
Honeycombe8
Mar 2012
#10
I think any technology in Education should be used extremely sparingly and only
liskddksil
Mar 2012
#11
Like pencils, and overhead projectors, they're fucking EVIL! Technology is EVIL!
NYC_SKP
Mar 2012
#43
I love it!! but it proves one thing. You can't even give education away in this country.
nanabugg
Mar 2012
#12
the only thing that matters are standardized test scores and corporate profits ya know nt
msongs
Mar 2012
#15
its price is what would make it attractive to the demographic(s) at my school
arely staircase
Mar 2012
#59
I also wonder about kids spending yet another chunk of time alone with a machine
EFerrari
Mar 2012
#36
The alternative, 35 kids sharing one teacher droning on in a monologue lecture...
NYC_SKP
Mar 2012
#40
Sorry, I don't agree. Hate the video if you wish, but the teacher centered lecture model is dead.
NYC_SKP
Mar 2012
#57
When I was a teacher, I taught science and math, mostly, then integrated thematic instruction, then
NYC_SKP
Mar 2012
#71
In my experience, kids don't pay attention "past 90 seconds" mostly because other kids are talking..
LooseWilly
Mar 2012
#78
Your rant presumes kids are naturally prone to misbehave or to become distracted.
NYC_SKP
Mar 2012
#79
Real academic experts are finding way too many content errors in Khan videos
proud2BlibKansan
Mar 2012
#47
It might be good for kids who want to learn. But those who don't. value education -
haele
Mar 2012
#54
Very cool! Naysayers would say that students will try to cheat, to not work at it...
NYC_SKP
Mar 2012
#73
Being a major open source advocate I dislike the "faulty exercise" 'complaints.'
joshcryer
Mar 2012
#74
To clarify, by "complete" I mean I followed the instructions. That's not mine!
joshcryer
Mar 2012
#86
I did this program with the modules in 5th grade— back in 1979-80. Now it's a gimmick to sell PCs...
LooseWilly
Mar 2012
#77
"one can always tell who does and who does not work with students in real life"
proud2BlibKansan
Mar 2012
#91