Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

boston bean

(36,929 posts)
12. Ok, let's break this down some.
Thu Dec 26, 2013, 02:10 PM
Dec 2013

Seems as though you are trying to say that what feminists point out here on DU is NEVER misogyny, but what we see at the link is.

Well, I can tell you that many of the same arguments Rush et al is making have been posted here on DU.

1)I understand the reality that some moms are single moms not by their choice. And I understand that some women believe they can have it all, and that's the crux of the problem. I have to tell you, as a man, where women are told that men have so many more advantages in society, we can't have it all. Women, you can't have it all either. Life is a series of compromises and choices.

- Constantly we are reminded here on DU that issues that concern women, aren't really issues, they are choices and men have it just as bad.

2) When you look at biology, look at the natural world, the roles of a male and female in society, and the other animals, the male typically is the dominant role. The female, it's not antithesis, or it's not competing, it's a complementary role. We as people in a smart society have lost the ability to have complimentary relationships in nuclear families, and it's tearing us apart. [Fox Business, Lou Dobbs Tonight, 5/29/13, via Media Matters]

- Constantly we are told our issues stem not from a culture, but from biology and these problems ought just be accepted cause that is the way it is... nature/biology dictates it.

3) WSJ's Taranto: "Female Sexual Freedom" Has Led To A "War On Men." James Taranto, editor of The Wall Street Journal's editorial page, accused "female sexual freedom" of causing a "war on men" during the June 18 edition of WSJ Live's Opinion Journal Live. [Wall Street Journal, Opinion Journal Live, 6/18/13, via Media Matters]

- Constantly we are reminded that our very presence as feminist a WAR on MEN on DU.

4) furthersRush Limbaugh: Feminism Is Rooted In "Sexual Perversion." On the August 27 edition of The Rush Limbaugh Show, host Limbaugh said that feminism "is based in what most people would classify as sexual perversion," later characterizing feminist leadership as "enraged" and "angry." [Premiere Radio Networks, The Rush Limbaugh Show, 8/27/13, via Media Matters]

- Constantly feminists on DU are reminded that it is the way, the tone, that causes all this strife on DU, that we are ANGRY, that we are damaged goods.

5) Fox Business Host: "Is There Something About The Female Brain That Is A Deterrent" To Women Being Tech Executives? On the November 18 edition of Fox Business' Varney & Co, host Stuart Varney wondered, "Is there something about the female brain that is a deterrent for getting on board with tech?" [Fox Business, Varney & Co, 11/18/13]

- Just try discussing issue with women entering the tech field, and see what happens. Point out the sexism within it and well, you better get your flame suit on.

6) Fox's John Stossel: Women Are Paid Less Than Men Because Women "Have Their Priorities In Order." On Fox & Friends on August 8, Fox Business' John Stossel and co-host Steve Doocy discussed the gender pay gap. While admitting that women are in fact paid 77 cents for each dollar men make, Stossel claimed that the discrepancy is because "we don't work the same jobs." Stossel went on to say "women have their priorities in order. They often choose jobs that are less time-consuming, not so far away, and not as dangerous." He concluded that if a true pay gap existed, the market would have sorted it out. [Fox News, Fox & Friends, 8/3/13, via Media Matters]

- Hear it all the time, men do the tough, dangerous jobs and it's the feminists fault.

7) Fox Host Steve Doocy: "So That Is A Myth, That Men Get Paid More Than Women." During the same Fox & Friends segment, Doocy asked Stossel if the differences between boys and girls are so clear, "why are the feminists still pushing gender equality?" After Stossel argued that there is no true gender pay gap because women work "less time-consuming" jobs, Doocy agreed saying, "So that is a myth, that men get paid more than women." [Fox News, Fox & Friends, 8/3/13, via Media Matters]

- As those in the mens group how they feel about this. They feel it isn't true either.

8) Limbaugh: Men Should Avoid Sexual Harassment Accusation By Asking Women "Will You Please Ask Your Breasts To Stop Staring At My Eyes?" On his radio show, Rush Limbaugh offered his "suggestion" to avoid being accused of sexual harassment: "You walk up to the woman and say, 'Will you please ask your breasts to stop staring at my eyes?'" [Premiere Radio Networks, The Rush Limbaugh Show, 12/9/13]

- Right here on DU it was suggested women ought to wear burqua's if they don't want the harassment men give them on the street.

9) Limbaugh Cracks Up At Notion Of Marital Rape. Rush Limbaugh took material for his November 26 radio program from "satire" blog Diversity Chronicles, choking down laughter while reading a post that mocked the notion of marital rape and explaining, "this is a website that does satire on how white men are blamed for everything." [Premiere Radio Networks, The Rush Limbaugh Show, 11/26/13, via Media Matters]

- Many times we get to hear how just how bad the men have it, when discussing feminist issues. Negating positive feminist discussion and how feminism actually does address issues for men as well.

10) WSJ's Taranto Says Of Alleged Domestic Assault: George Zimmerman Simply "Guilty Of Being Male." After George Zimmerman allegedly threatened his estranged wife withviolence, James Taranto tweeted that Zimmerman was "guilty of being male"

- I don't know about you but I've seen a bunch of comment when serious discussion of feminist issues are being discussed and you get the pat response of "guilty of being male".

We've heard it all hear before as well. If you don't believe, truly you haven't been paying attention. Is every scenario the same as listed above, no, but the responses and behavior and actions of some here, match the same responses you get from those misogynists you recognize in Limbaugh, Erickson, Stossel, etc.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Do you also define racism for people of color? redqueen Dec 2013 #1
Just providing a link. Enjoy or don't. It is your choice. Pretzel_Warrior Dec 2013 #2
are you interrupting terminal uniqueness lol nt msongs Dec 2013 #7
heh. I had to look that up. Pretzel_Warrior Dec 2013 #42
I dunno, do people define what men are thinking when they look at a woman? The Straight Story Dec 2013 #3
I've heard that happens sometimes. NaturalHigh Dec 2013 #11
I'm sorry, but that was uncalled for. nt AverageJoe90 Dec 2013 #21
Yes, that is misogyny. NuclearDem Dec 2013 #4
True. I just saw this Media Matters piece on FB and thought Pretzel_Warrior Dec 2013 #6
I'm not going to ignore misogyny and sexism among liberals and progressives NuclearDem Dec 2013 #16
go for it. it's your bandwidth. I happen to think there are more important things going on than Pretzel_Warrior Dec 2013 #24
So, then, why your near constant presence chervilant Dec 2013 #43
near constant? I do believe you overstate. I've avoided most of the recent threads Pretzel_Warrior Dec 2013 #44
Then you clearly are not paying attention. NuclearDem Dec 2013 #46
I'm just waiting for proof. Pretzel_Warrior Dec 2013 #61
"Same with man hate." xulamaude Dec 2013 #72
no. but there are women who hate men. Pretzel_Warrior Dec 2013 #77
And there are also women who hate women. xulamaude Dec 2013 #81
I guess men win the big hate stick then... Whisp Dec 2013 #132
+a gazillion chervilant Dec 2013 #41
when have I called anyone here a radical feminist? Pretzel_Warrior Dec 2013 #45
So, does 'not' having called anyone a radical feminist xulamaude Dec 2013 #49
it is a necessary but insufficient condition of being a good guy. look up logical tautologies Pretzel_Warrior Dec 2013 #51
No, no, no xulamaude Dec 2013 #57
the reason why is pretty obvious Pretzel_Warrior Dec 2013 #59
It seems that you chose to take that 'radical feminists' xulamaude Dec 2013 #64
because the only one "in the room" as it were was little ol Pretzel Boy. Pretzel_Warrior Dec 2013 #66
Are you going to answer my question? xulamaude Dec 2013 #67
already asked and answered Pretzel_Warrior Dec 2013 #71
Even though "asked and answered"... xulamaude Dec 2013 #73
That's not what radical feminism is. NuclearDem Dec 2013 #76
well there you go. Pretzel_Warrior Dec 2013 #85
Yes, thank you :) xulamaude Dec 2013 #87
So, beside the fact that DU is a patriarchal shithole, (founded by three guys, you know), and ... 11 Bravo Dec 2013 #141
What? Where'd you come from? nt xulamaude Dec 2013 #142
Been here for 11 years, but I'll try and remember to ask your permission before posting again. 11 Bravo Dec 2013 #145
How have I been enjoying myself? That one? xulamaude Dec 2013 #146
Sounds like a tough gig. I guess we all have our cross to bear. 11 Bravo Dec 2013 #147
Except I don't find it to be a cross to bear xulamaude Dec 2013 #149
Bravo, this is not your own private property. CTyankee Dec 2013 #154
Because when we do provide links, they get hidden or alerted on as call outs NuclearDem Dec 2013 #68
"It's easy to find too, it's usually in a subthread" xulamaude Dec 2013 #78
the burden usually lies with the one making the argument Pretzel_Warrior Dec 2013 #86
Cheap parlor trick, eh? xulamaude Dec 2013 #90
No, just stupid, wrongheaded, and suffering from a very blinkered world view. Comrade Grumpy Dec 2013 #74
So "stupid" is not xulamaude Dec 2013 #83
No, not at all like ex-smokers. NuclearDem Dec 2013 #95
+1 NaturalHigh Dec 2013 #100
That response was not directed at you, chervilant Dec 2013 #129
+100 Tien1985 Dec 2013 #56
Sorry to late-post but I just started reading this thread and wanted to give you a quick note. leeroysphitz Dec 2013 #109
When did supporting Democratic candidates mean tolerating sexism and misogyny among progressives? NuclearDem Dec 2013 #144
Sometimes misogyny is obvious, yet quite often it's not... LanternWaste Dec 2013 #5
Know role or shut up. And we hear some of this from some men yet seabeyond Dec 2013 #8
more like "choose your battles". But I respect your right to hear "misogniny" in virtually anything Pretzel_Warrior Dec 2013 #13
You have no idea... EOTE Dec 2013 #65
and you totally rolled over the point i made. we are addressing those issues on fox, HERE seabeyond Dec 2013 #80
my participation in my thread is now over Pretzel_Warrior Dec 2013 #91
piece of work. close your eyes, stick fingers in ears sing a song seabeyond Dec 2013 #93
What?! Cut and run?! nt xulamaude Dec 2013 #98
When someone tells me, Capt. Obvious Dec 2013 #19
is that a Haiku that doesn't quite fit the parameters? Pretzel_Warrior Dec 2013 #47
you would be the man following along, dissin me for no rhyme or reason, telling me you take nothing seabeyond Dec 2013 #82
Yet, we're the ones accused of xulamaude Dec 2013 #96
You position a child, for example, Capt. Obvious Dec 2013 #97
This is getting to be utterly cruel. xulamaude Dec 2013 #99
+ one for a learning moment, serious and learning. OilemFirchen Dec 2013 #127
Might as well jump in!! nt xulamaude Dec 2013 #131
I dipped my toes, thank you. OilemFirchen Dec 2013 #134
"Know role or shut up" NaturalHigh Dec 2013 #79
the OP. quit missing with du, loook at fox. but, fox is doing what is happening on the board. seabeyond Dec 2013 #84
You think the OP was telling you to shut up? NaturalHigh Dec 2013 #88
again. creative reading. no one told you to shut up. Pretzel_Warrior Dec 2013 #89
you said focus on fox, not du. it is happening on du. yet... you repeat seabeyond Dec 2013 #92
"did you literally tell me to shut up? no" NaturalHigh Dec 2013 #101
You'll notice that many of us xulamaude Dec 2013 #104
Yes, I noticed that many of you interpreted it the same way. NaturalHigh Dec 2013 #108
One in which you were not "offended" xulamaude Dec 2013 #111
No, I was not offended. NaturalHigh Dec 2013 #112
Clearly not, but you labeled our calling xulamaude Dec 2013 #115
as i clearly stated, and this poster you reply to is very much into what is literally posted, seabeyond Dec 2013 #116
But, hey, only the boys xulamaude Dec 2013 #119
nah. i think SOME mens purpose is to creating the hysterical emotional angry woman at all cost. nt seabeyond Dec 2013 #120
I almost always disagree with your posts, Seabeyond... NaturalHigh Dec 2013 #121
I'm likely conflating posters, OilemFirchen Dec 2013 #135
wtf? what? you men just creep out of the woodwork to throw out insults now? seabeyond Dec 2013 #136
Insult? OilemFirchen Dec 2013 #140
Just call em as I see em. NaturalHigh Dec 2013 #122
Pot meet kettle, then. xulamaude Dec 2013 #124
i am fine thank you. well, i am sick, but fine. got medicine. thanks. but, you call them seabeyond Dec 2013 #126
Here's misogyny: Sending mothers' sons to die in illegal "wars." WinkyDink Dec 2013 #9
sounds a bit like misanthropy as well Pretzel_Warrior Dec 2013 #48
Well, there is that, too. Death-cults rule the world. WinkyDink Dec 2013 #123
Dear Fox: Stupid, mean and misogynistic are no ways to go through life. Scuba Dec 2013 #10
Ok, let's break this down some. boston bean Dec 2013 #12
I'll be honest. I'm not going to read through your long "fisking" of my Media Matters article Pretzel_Warrior Dec 2013 #14
ignore, deflect, deny. It's all been said and done here, and feminists when pointing it boston bean Dec 2013 #15
You're aren't even going to bother to read it, but you're going to comment on it anyway kcr Dec 2013 #18
unless she has links to back up her assertions about what was said.... Pretzel_Warrior Dec 2013 #22
I've seen it, too. Plenty of times. kcr Dec 2013 #34
Yeah, that seems to be the case, I think. AverageJoe90 Dec 2013 #25
agree with you there. this too shall pass. Pretzel_Warrior Dec 2013 #28
"When all you've got is a hammer, everything looks like a nail." NaturalHigh Dec 2013 #53
And let me be honest with you, PW. And in a way that could be helpful. CTyankee Dec 2013 #117
"Seems as though you are trying to say that what feminists point out here on DU is NEVER misogyny, redqueen Dec 2013 #17
so my posting an article link is somehow proofe I deny misogynistic things are ever said on DU? Pretzel_Warrior Dec 2013 #20
It's the wording of your title. The implication is as clear as day. nt redqueen Dec 2013 #23
clear as day for people who are looking for things to be offended by Pretzel_Warrior Dec 2013 #27
What makes you think I'm offended. boston bean Dec 2013 #32
If your intent isn't to deny, then why the links or it doesn't happen reply to me upthread? n/t kcr Dec 2013 #36
never said it didn't happen here. I just appreciate discussing actual things said Pretzel_Warrior Dec 2013 #50
The time to do that is in the actual threads kcr Dec 2013 #54
So, after a number of disingenuous, defensive responses, you've decided to chervilant Dec 2013 #55
And what we see at the link is what I often see here in one form or another. nt boston bean Dec 2013 #26
Surely not! redqueen Dec 2013 #29
Or this, either! Nevah! Nevah, I say! redqueen Dec 2013 #30
Or this, either! redqueen Dec 2013 #31
Or this! Here, people claim sexual objectification doesn't even exist! That's totally different! redqueen Dec 2013 #33
And nobody here says addressing rape culture is an effort to "criminalize male sexuality"! Ever! redqueen Dec 2013 #35
thanks for all the links to people on DU saying these things Pretzel_Warrior Dec 2013 #40
Any discussion of objectification is called an effort to "criminalize male sexuality" by some here. redqueen Dec 2013 #52
so you've directed me to posts made over a year ago discussing women's pay gap? Pretzel_Warrior Dec 2013 #58
So, as long as they argue that women deserve to be paid less nicely, that's ok? redqueen Dec 2013 #62
Dismissing the very links your requested because they invalidate your premise do not LanternWaste Dec 2013 #113
oh... i am in pain and cannot laugh. and still... seabeyond Dec 2013 #118
the trouble with those links hfojvt Dec 2013 #103
Pretzel Warrior is no stranger to these types of threads. nt xulamaude Dec 2013 #105
Well, if the OP is one of the 90% kcr Dec 2013 #106
but spending 3 hours in a day is NOT hfojvt Dec 2013 #107
That still doesn't change my argument kcr Dec 2013 #110
I'm gonna stop cause this is TOO FUCKING EASY! redqueen Dec 2013 #37
I know... I was like wow... many of the things I've read right here on DU. boston bean Dec 2013 #38
OK....let's look at this a bit... davidn3600 Dec 2013 #128
When I hear the same things coming from people on DU boston bean Dec 2013 #133
"men also have problems and issues and legitimate concerns" xulamaude Dec 2013 #137
hey david, i am all over the mens issues and standing up for men about 90% more than you men. seabeyond Dec 2013 #139
No kidding, sea xulamaude Dec 2013 #143
"You men" "you betcha" "why aren't men taking care of boys" The Straight Story Dec 2013 #150
An example of going after a feminist rather than talking about the boys. Good job seabeyond Dec 2013 #153
"men also have problems and issues and legitimate concerns" NuclearDem Dec 2013 #151
sing it brother... i stand behind you on all that righteous rant. seabeyond Dec 2013 #155
Because only RW Fundie Whacknuts xulamaude Dec 2013 #39
Nah.... ProudToBeBlueInRhody Dec 2013 #60
By this logic there can be no criticism of the President or Democratic Congress people. intaglio Dec 2013 #63
nope. just bringing fresh perspective to what we're really fighting against Pretzel_Warrior Dec 2013 #69
Unfortunately your fresh perspective is about maintaining the status quo intaglio Dec 2013 #102
thank you. Matariki Dec 2013 #138
Alright, you clearly do not get it. NuclearDem Dec 2013 #148
just because there is blatant racism somewhere, doesn't excuse less overt racism on DU La Lioness Priyanka Dec 2013 #70
agreed. I have asked people to point out what was said specifically Pretzel_Warrior Dec 2013 #75
i find denial of sexism to be 'truly misogynistic'. La Lioness Priyanka Dec 2013 #94
I'm kind of worried about the circular reasoning this leads to. redgreenandblue Dec 2013 #125
I think that's the point. NaturalHigh Dec 2013 #130
claiming a prejudice that is well established and experienced by its victims La Lioness Priyanka Dec 2013 #156
Certainly examples of unveiled misogyny etherealtruth Dec 2013 #114
Marbles in my mouth Limbaugh is a Misanthrope, thank God orpupilofnature57 Dec 2013 #152
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»You wanna see misogyny?! ...»Reply #12