Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: You wanna see misogyny?! This is misogyny. DU internecine wars notwithstanding [View all]redqueen
(115,186 posts)52. Any discussion of objectification is called an effort to "criminalize male sexuality" by some here.
Have you really managed not to notice at least the most obvious of these? Really?
You really haven't noticed the continuing arguments that the pay gap is either small enough so that it doesn't matter, or an outright myth? Really?
Here. I'll do that one. It's super fucking easy.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/11144984
Oh wait, that's one's banned. Let me find another (cause it sure as shit isn't hard, so I don't mind doing your legwork).
"The pay gap" is a distorted and manufactured wedge issue that alienates us from MOST voters.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=790672
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=790672
Notice the careful wording to avoid saying it's a myth. No, it's not a total myth, it's just barely a percentage worth bothering about. Apparently if women earn almost as much as men, that's good enough, so shut up!
And finally this one
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002574941#post17
But seriously, yeah. Not hard to find this shit. So not hard at all. Super easy to not see at all, for some, I guess.
As for the "crminalize male sexuality" one, search for the words. It's not hard. But I have a lot of those who echo the people at your link on ignore, so...
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
156 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
You wanna see misogyny?! This is misogyny. DU internecine wars notwithstanding [View all]
Pretzel_Warrior
Dec 2013
OP
I dunno, do people define what men are thinking when they look at a woman?
The Straight Story
Dec 2013
#3
go for it. it's your bandwidth. I happen to think there are more important things going on than
Pretzel_Warrior
Dec 2013
#24
near constant? I do believe you overstate. I've avoided most of the recent threads
Pretzel_Warrior
Dec 2013
#44
it is a necessary but insufficient condition of being a good guy. look up logical tautologies
Pretzel_Warrior
Dec 2013
#51
because the only one "in the room" as it were was little ol Pretzel Boy.
Pretzel_Warrior
Dec 2013
#66
So, beside the fact that DU is a patriarchal shithole, (founded by three guys, you know), and ...
11 Bravo
Dec 2013
#141
Been here for 11 years, but I'll try and remember to ask your permission before posting again.
11 Bravo
Dec 2013
#145
Because when we do provide links, they get hidden or alerted on as call outs
NuclearDem
Dec 2013
#68
No, just stupid, wrongheaded, and suffering from a very blinkered world view.
Comrade Grumpy
Dec 2013
#74
Sorry to late-post but I just started reading this thread and wanted to give you a quick note.
leeroysphitz
Dec 2013
#109
When did supporting Democratic candidates mean tolerating sexism and misogyny among progressives?
NuclearDem
Dec 2013
#144
more like "choose your battles". But I respect your right to hear "misogniny" in virtually anything
Pretzel_Warrior
Dec 2013
#13
and you totally rolled over the point i made. we are addressing those issues on fox, HERE
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#80
you would be the man following along, dissin me for no rhyme or reason, telling me you take nothing
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#82
the OP. quit missing with du, loook at fox. but, fox is doing what is happening on the board.
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#84
as i clearly stated, and this poster you reply to is very much into what is literally posted,
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#116
nah. i think SOME mens purpose is to creating the hysterical emotional angry woman at all cost. nt
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#120
i am fine thank you. well, i am sick, but fine. got medicine. thanks. but, you call them
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#126
I'll be honest. I'm not going to read through your long "fisking" of my Media Matters article
Pretzel_Warrior
Dec 2013
#14
ignore, deflect, deny. It's all been said and done here, and feminists when pointing it
boston bean
Dec 2013
#15
You're aren't even going to bother to read it, but you're going to comment on it anyway
kcr
Dec 2013
#18
"Seems as though you are trying to say that what feminists point out here on DU is NEVER misogyny,
redqueen
Dec 2013
#17
so my posting an article link is somehow proofe I deny misogynistic things are ever said on DU?
Pretzel_Warrior
Dec 2013
#20
If your intent isn't to deny, then why the links or it doesn't happen reply to me upthread? n/t
kcr
Dec 2013
#36
never said it didn't happen here. I just appreciate discussing actual things said
Pretzel_Warrior
Dec 2013
#50
And what we see at the link is what I often see here in one form or another. nt
boston bean
Dec 2013
#26
Or this! Here, people claim sexual objectification doesn't even exist! That's totally different!
redqueen
Dec 2013
#33
And nobody here says addressing rape culture is an effort to "criminalize male sexuality"! Ever!
redqueen
Dec 2013
#35
Any discussion of objectification is called an effort to "criminalize male sexuality" by some here.
redqueen
Dec 2013
#52
so you've directed me to posts made over a year ago discussing women's pay gap?
Pretzel_Warrior
Dec 2013
#58
So, as long as they argue that women deserve to be paid less nicely, that's ok?
redqueen
Dec 2013
#62
Dismissing the very links your requested because they invalidate your premise do not
LanternWaste
Dec 2013
#113
hey david, i am all over the mens issues and standing up for men about 90% more than you men.
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#139
An example of going after a feminist rather than talking about the boys. Good job
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#153
By this logic there can be no criticism of the President or Democratic Congress people.
intaglio
Dec 2013
#63
nope. just bringing fresh perspective to what we're really fighting against
Pretzel_Warrior
Dec 2013
#69
just because there is blatant racism somewhere, doesn't excuse less overt racism on DU
La Lioness Priyanka
Dec 2013
#70
claiming a prejudice that is well established and experienced by its victims
La Lioness Priyanka
Dec 2013
#156