Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

muriel_volestrangler

(106,273 posts)
11. There's a long history about how hostile bowling should be
Mon Dec 30, 2013, 06:29 AM
Dec 2013

In the early 1930s, faced with the Australian Don Bradman, probably the best batsman the world has ever seen, the English team developed a style called 'bodyline', which meant bowling at the unprotected parts of the body (and back then, they had no helmets or body padding - only the leg pads), and positioning fielders to catch the balls they fended off with the bat.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bodyline

It was a diplomatic incident. Eventually a rule was inserted to change where you could put the fielders so that it wasn't so easy to get catches out of it. Ever since then, there's been controversy about how much it's OK to aim at the batsman, not the stumps. It's reckoned to be unfair to pepper inexperienced batsmen (or those who are specialist bowlers - they have to bat too) with dangerous balls. So I can see why Hadlee is saying Lee shouldn't have done this (see reply #8).

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Piers Morgan tweets pic o...»Reply #11