Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

struggle4progress

(119,265 posts)

19. IMO it's possible under current judicial interpretation of the first amendment

Reply to Nye Bevan (Original post)

Thu Jan 2, 2014, 08:59 PM

Jan 2014

to prosecute speech presenting a clear and present danger to peace and good order, as well as to prosecute incitement that actually leads to criminality under various theories, including conspiracy. Intimidation is also prosecutable. Moreover, defamatory accusations against sufficiently small groups of identifiable persons can produce civil liability as slander or libel

Aside from such exceptions, US cultural tradition generally aims to allow even unpleasant and idiotic speech

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

40 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Would you like to see the First Amendment modified so that "hate speech" could be banned? [View all] Nye Bevan Jan 2014 OP

there is no FUCK NO option. WTF? Warren Stupidity Jan 2014 #1

Leave the amendment alone! hrmjustin Jan 2014 #2

Being a civil libertarian means defending the right of speech you personally find offensive. Chan790 Jan 2014 #3

No way. NaturalHigh Jan 2014 #4

No Kaleva Jan 2014 #5

Who would define "hate speech? YarnAddict Jan 2014 #6

You prett much nailed it. Dissent would be branded hate. Nuclear Unicorn Jan 2014 #14

what yarn said. SCUBANOW Jan 2014 #38

NO! Hands off greytdemocrat Jan 2014 #7

What is "hate speech" to some may not be "hate speech" to others......... wandy Jan 2014 #8

Only if... FreeJoe Jan 2014 #9

Hell no LittleBlue Jan 2014 #10

Absolutely TheCowsCameHome Jan 2014 #11

No... but I am a small part of the FlushRush Campaign... Jasana Jan 2014 #12

Do you think Rush should be arrested and imprisoned or fined for his speech? Nye Bevan Jan 2014 #15

No. No arresting. No fining... Jasana Jan 2014 #22

My daughter is studying the politics course exboyfil Jan 2014 #13

What is "hate speech"? OutNow Jan 2014 #16

No. H2O Man Jan 2014 #17

no Liberal_in_LA Jan 2014 #18

IMO it's possible under current judicial interpretation of the first amendment struggle4progress Jan 2014 #19

Why stop there? Let's ban "hate thought", too. WillowTree Jan 2014 #20

Would you like to see the First Amendment modified so that public criticism of hate speech Zorra Jan 2014 #21

This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Jan 2014 #25

WTF? Then John Boehner and Mitch McConnell would be serving life without parole. Atman Jan 2014 #23

This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Jan 2014 #24

Free speech is offense as well as defense. Thanks. Eleanors38 Jan 2014 #30

I hate the term "hate speech", it is orwellian quinnox Jan 2014 #26

Not really. Turbineguy Jan 2014 #27

Straight-forward. Thank you. nt Eleanors38 Jan 2014 #28

Too slippery a slope. dballance Jan 2014 #29

No, elleng Jan 2014 #31

no 840high Jan 2014 #32

I think you got an unequivocal answer. n/t customerserviceguy Jan 2014 #33

Another Fuck No. n/t Skip Intro Jan 2014 #34

All speech I hate should be banned! n/t hughee99 Jan 2014 #35

Only the double plus ungood speech should be banned Dr. Strange Jan 2014 #36

Absolutely not MrScorpio Jan 2014 #37

I honestly can't believe that someone voted yes. NaturalHigh Jan 2014 #39

kick Nye Bevan Jan 2014 #40