General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Any DUers around during Watergate? [View all]BobUp
(347 posts)which may not mean much, Christie might just claim she's disgruntled, she'll say he gave his approval, it might go back and forth, he said, she said. What matters is emails or documents with dates & times, of communications between the two. That would be proof of co conspiracy.
I'm sort of surprised only one head rolled, aren't we?
e.g., I'm sittin' in my office, and I tell another person, well, it's time to shut it down, via phone/email/text, the person I sent this to communicates back okay, will do, that's two people, one who gave the directive, and the other who carried it out. yes? This isn't just a case of people just following orders IMO.
Also, stopping or impeding traffic on a interstate highway, for no valid reason, which caused death? Um, federal indictment/s possible? More heads rolling?
And while all this went down, Crispy didn't know anything, hard to believe, ain't it?