General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: This message was self-deleted by its author [View all]jollyreaper2112
(1,941 posts)One, there's no pregnancy.
Two, there's a pregnancy.
When there's no pregnancy, I think either party has the right to dissent. If the decision is not unanimous, no baby. A divorce could follow which is within either party's right. If the man or woman doesn't want a child, they can find a partner who is more willing. And this really should have been discussed before marriage in the first place. If it was and an agreement was made and someone changed their mind, oh well.
If there is a pregnancy, I tend to default to the woman getting more of a say because it's her body. If she doesn't want the pregnancy, she shouldn't be forced to term. That's just basic human rights. If the man wants the baby and she does not, that's kind of horrific. Here's the baby he's always wanted and she's going to abort it. But you weigh that horror against the horror of denying her the right to control her own body. Not good. Put the other way around, she wants the baby and he's not ready for it and now he's on the hook for child support for the next 18 years. And there are women who will deliberately get pregnant to trap a guy into the relationship, deliberately stop birth control, just like there are guys who will punch their woman in the stomach repeatedly to force a miscarriage. There's enough horror stories from all sides here.
I don't have any answers but it sounds like you guys have some talking to do.