Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Tariffs were very strong American worker wage protection, HENCE corporations hate tariffs. [View all]brentspeak
(18,290 posts)34. I see you've thrown in the towel
By trotting out the same old Pew chart which I've called you out on about 12 times already on this website. When all else fails in your attempt to pimp US Chamber of Commerce job-killing free trade propaganda, try to make it appear as if those opposed to today's job-killing free trade deals are no different than Tea Party Republicans.
But, yet again, what you always conveniently fail to highlight is that it was the Tea Party Republicans themselves who have been instrumental in passing the job-killing free trade deals in the first place. And it's been the Democrats who have been trying to stop them:
http://firedoglake.com/2011/10/12/job-killing-trade-deals-pass-congress-amidst-record-democratic-opposition/
Job-Killing Trade Deals Pass Congress Amidst Record Democratic Opposition
...
Given the strong Democratic opposition, ultimately it was the Tea Party GOP freshmen who passed these job-killing deals (Bush and Obama's brokered KORUS, Panama and Colombian deals) despite their campaign commitments at home to stand up for Main Street businesses, against more job offshoring and for Buy American requirements.
"Democrats favor stronger relations with China. Republicans favor getting tougher with China. Getting tougher with China may not be the liberal policy you think it is."
Actually it is, as is opposing today's "free trade" agreements:
http://firedoglake.com/2011/10/12/job-killing-trade-deals-pass-congress-amidst-record-democratic-opposition/
Record of Congressional Democratic Opposition to Democratic Presidents on Trade Pacts
-82.3% of House Democrats opposed the Colombia FTA (158 Democrats against, 31 for)
-67.7% of House Democrats opposed the Korea FTA (130 Democrats against, 59 for)
-64,1% of House Democrats opposed the Panama FTA (123 Democrats against, 66 for)
-60.6% of Democrats opposed NAFTA (1993)
-35% opposed the WTO (1994)
-65.56% opposed China PNTR (2000)
Record of Congressional Democratic Opposition to GOP Presidents on Trade Pacts
-62.6% opposed the Chile FTA (2003)
-62.14% opposed the Singapore FTA (2003)
-41.3% opposed the Australia FTA (2004)
-39.32% opposed the Morocco FTA (2004)
-92.6% opposed the Central America Free Trade Agreement (2005)
-40.4% opposed the Bahrain FTA (2005)
-87.6% opposed the Oman FTA (2006)
slightly more than half opposed the Peru FTA (2007)
Since it was Tea Party Republicans who helped pass the latest free trade deals, and since it were Democrats who've been opposed to the deals being passed, it appears as though you have a lot more in common with the Tea Party -- and lot less common in common with liberals and Democrats -- than you let on.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
60 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Tariffs were very strong American worker wage protection, HENCE corporations hate tariffs. [View all]
livingwagenow
Feb 2014
OP
No. Getting rid of high tariffs was a big progressive win in the early 20th century.
pampango
Feb 2014
#4
"high tariffs" are one thing; like any other regulation, tariffs can and should be used
TheFrenchRazor
Feb 2014
#5
Yes the RTAA was FDR's first step in reversing high tariffs followed by GATT and the ITO.
pampango
Feb 2014
#8
"corporations thrived under high tariffs then at the expense of the working class"
brentspeak
Feb 2014
#22
Exactly. Historically corporations have thrived and the working class suffered under both high and
pampango
Feb 2014
#26
The VAT is not a tariff. The VAT effects the final cost of imports and domestic products equally.
pampango
Feb 2014
#31
Fine. So the "Import Turnover Tax" is "the equal of the domestic VAT". When you combine the two
pampango
Feb 2014
#33
Yes there is. Even the poll you reference shows republicans want more to 'get tough' with China.
pampango
Feb 2014
#53
Ditto. The links you posted to make your case were to posts from a "banned troll".
pampango
Feb 2014
#60
Are you really suggesting that the global economy in the 1920's - 1930's has any
Egalitarian Thug
Feb 2014
#51
I believe that history is relevant. And I believe that the experience of other countries is too.
pampango
Feb 2014
#54
You asked: "Are you really suggesting that the global economy in the 1920's - 1930's has any
pampango
Feb 2014
#56
No - Fair means developing nations do not become colonies of multinational corporations
Armstead
Feb 2014
#25
Only two of the DU Corporate Warrior Brigade? It was a Sunday, I suppose.
Egalitarian Thug
Feb 2014
#52