Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Tariffs were very strong American worker wage protection, HENCE corporations hate tariffs. [View all]pampango
(24,692 posts)48. You are really good at titles for your posts. :)
And your response to those poll results is equally predictable. You cite evidence of how Democratic congresspeople voted on trade agreements. I have acknowledged before, and will again, that you are correct.
As I have said many times those polled by Pew were not politicians or congresspeople. They were voters. Tea party politicians have routinely betrayed their base with their votes on trade agreements. Surprise, surprise.
From Think Progress:
Most Tea Partiers Think Free Trade Agreements That Tea Party Candidates Support Are Bad For The Country
Whats ironic about most tea partiers opposing free trade is that numerous high-profile tea party-endorsed candidates are ardent backers of the policy. From sitting U.S. senators to relatively unknown individuals who have become serious candidates for higher office, politicians who have co-opted the tea party movement do not share its view on free trade.
http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2010/09/30/121808/tea-partiers-trade-bad/
Whats ironic about most tea partiers opposing free trade is that numerous high-profile tea party-endorsed candidates are ardent backers of the policy. From sitting U.S. senators to relatively unknown individuals who have become serious candidates for higher office, politicians who have co-opted the tea party movement do not share its view on free trade.
http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2010/09/30/121808/tea-partiers-trade-bad/
At any rate the reason for my posting those poll results was to show partisan attitudes about US policy towards China.
In one poll a majority of Republicans (51-44%) favored getting tough on China (tea partiers were an even more lopsided 66-30% in favor of a tough approach), while a majority (61-32%) of Democrats favored a policy of building a stronger relationship with China. Quite a difference between Democrats and tea party republicans.
The other poll showed an overwhelming majority (67-26%) of Romney voters preferred a 'get tough with China' policy, while Obama voters still favored a "build a stronger relationship" by a 51-42% margin. I don't think any of us really think that Romney would have really gotten tough with China, but that is what his voters overwhelmingly wanted him to do.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
60 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Tariffs were very strong American worker wage protection, HENCE corporations hate tariffs. [View all]
livingwagenow
Feb 2014
OP
No. Getting rid of high tariffs was a big progressive win in the early 20th century.
pampango
Feb 2014
#4
"high tariffs" are one thing; like any other regulation, tariffs can and should be used
TheFrenchRazor
Feb 2014
#5
Yes the RTAA was FDR's first step in reversing high tariffs followed by GATT and the ITO.
pampango
Feb 2014
#8
"corporations thrived under high tariffs then at the expense of the working class"
brentspeak
Feb 2014
#22
Exactly. Historically corporations have thrived and the working class suffered under both high and
pampango
Feb 2014
#26
The VAT is not a tariff. The VAT effects the final cost of imports and domestic products equally.
pampango
Feb 2014
#31
Fine. So the "Import Turnover Tax" is "the equal of the domestic VAT". When you combine the two
pampango
Feb 2014
#33
Yes there is. Even the poll you reference shows republicans want more to 'get tough' with China.
pampango
Feb 2014
#53
Ditto. The links you posted to make your case were to posts from a "banned troll".
pampango
Feb 2014
#60
Are you really suggesting that the global economy in the 1920's - 1930's has any
Egalitarian Thug
Feb 2014
#51
I believe that history is relevant. And I believe that the experience of other countries is too.
pampango
Feb 2014
#54
You asked: "Are you really suggesting that the global economy in the 1920's - 1930's has any
pampango
Feb 2014
#56
No - Fair means developing nations do not become colonies of multinational corporations
Armstead
Feb 2014
#25
Only two of the DU Corporate Warrior Brigade? It was a Sunday, I suppose.
Egalitarian Thug
Feb 2014
#52