General Discussion

badtoworse

(5,957 posts)

13. I can't disagree with you about the need for scrutiny or Z's and Dunn's responsibility.

Tue Feb 18, 2014, 01:55 PM

Feb 2014

The bottom line question is "Shall Issue" vs. "May Issue". There most certainly are people who should not be issued a CCW permit, but the onus needs to be on the state to show why a person should be denied. You don't have to demonstrate a need to exercise any of your other rights, so why should 2nd Amendment rights be an exception?

Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

14 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Growth chart of right to carry [View all] hack89 Feb 2014 OP

Kicking. I'm surprised the 9th Circuit ruled this way, but the ruling is certainly welcome. badtoworse Feb 2014 #1

Shall issue? Tommy_Carcetti Feb 2014 #2

Abuse of civil rights by a very few, does not and should not negate the rights of the many. badtoworse Feb 2014 #4

Do you think that either Zimmerman or Dunn should have been carte blanche? Tommy_Carcetti Feb 2014 #6

I'm not familiar with the permitting process in Florida. badtoworse Feb 2014 #8

I know with Zimmerman, there was his prior arrest for battery on a LEO Tommy_Carcetti Feb 2014 #10

I can't disagree with you about the need for scrutiny or Z's and Dunn's responsibility. badtoworse Feb 2014 #13

When I Start to Gather Signatures To Repeal otohara Feb 2014 #3

Yet the bigger danger is the drive to the campus hack89 Feb 2014 #5

Do Tell otohara Feb 2014 #7

Irrational fear of the extremely rare hack89 Feb 2014 #9

Not really an expert on the subject Risk Management, are we? Jeff In Milwaukee Feb 2014 #11

Talking about getting killed in a car wreck vice being shot by a legal CCW holder. hack89 Feb 2014 #12

Locking. Purveyor Feb 2014 #14