"US, EU staged classic regime change in Ukraine."

[sibelian]

91. OK, so you propose that the report is bad beause the source is bad

I ask you for examples to back up your claim and you provide me with the example that 's under dispute as evidence for your point.

That's called ASSUMING THE THING YOU'RE SETTING OUT TO PROVE. It's actully pretty impressive as most examples of circular logic I've pulled to bits at least involve one or two actual STEPS along the circle. Your circle consists of ONE STEP.

There's no point saying silly things like "You go on loving the propaganda" - you have absolutely no idea whatsoever what my actual position on this subject is. It's like you're an automaton talking to an imaginary friend.

LET'S PLAY A GAME.

Let's pretend I'm not whatever you need me to be to make you feel like a clever person on an Internet message board but a real person potentially persuadable that you have a believable point to make about the RT. Go ahead, make it. If it looks like the paper is operating outside ordinary standards of objective journalism, well let's see how! Wouldn't that be interesting?

Hint: You needn't start off on the "MEEEEEEH! It'S RUSSIA!!!!" foot. That's not going to convince me.

Actual, fact/or/evidence-based contradictions of the report's CLAIMS are VERY likely to convince me.