Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

BOHICA12

(471 posts)

19. No, they were breaking into his neighbor's house and

Reply to LisaL (Reply #14)

Fri Mar 23, 2012, 08:50 PM

Mar 2012

stealing from his neighbor. How far did his responsibility go? According to the Grand Jury, it went up to and including shooting the two felons.

Where does your responsibility end?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

27 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Just a reminder: before George Zimmerman, there was Mr. Joe Horn of Texas [View all] jpak Mar 2012 OP

I remember that very well -- Hell Hath No Fury Mar 2012 #1

Joe Horn = Free sadbear Mar 2012 #2

Would have been no billed without Castle Doctrine anyway ProgressiveProfessor Mar 2012 #3

Cold blooded murder and racist too - he thought they were "black" jpak Mar 2012 #4

Does the phrase "All White Jury" ring a bell? jpak Mar 2012 #10

So you claim to know who was on that Grand Jury? ProgressiveProfessor Mar 2012 #11

And Joe Horn Had Support From Our Resident Gun Militants, As Well. (n/t) Paladin Mar 2012 #5

The horror! The simple act of *not* home invading or burglarizing could have prevented this outcome. Chuck Bobuck Mar 2012 #6

Horn was told by 911 operator to NOT go out and confront anyone. LisaL Mar 2012 #7

Advice from an emergency telecommunicator is never legally binding. Chuck Bobuck Mar 2012 #8

Then its not binding in Zimmerman's case either. LisaL Mar 2012 #9

It never was. Those who claimed it was were wrong ProgressiveProfessor Mar 2012 #12

He killed two repeat felons in the commission of a felony .... BOHICA12 Mar 2012 #13

But these people were not stealing from him and his life was not in danger while he was sitting in LisaL Mar 2012 #14

The laws in Texas are different ...... oldhippie Mar 2012 #18

He can protect his own property with deadly force. LisaL Mar 2012 #21

As I said, you can protect third person's property ... oldhippie Mar 2012 #25

Why did his lawyer not argue that it was perfectly legal for him to kill people over LisaL Mar 2012 #26

Because he was legal on both fronts ...... oldhippie Mar 2012 #27

No, they were breaking into his neighbor's house and BOHICA12 Mar 2012 #19

Even fanatical gun fans think this was a really dumb and bad shoot. I am glad this cost him... Logical Mar 2012 #15

I don't know why it would cost him anything to defend himsel, since grand jury refused LisaL Mar 2012 #16

He had two attorneys. Many discussions of thousands of dollars in substantial legal fees Logical Mar 2012 #17

This message was self-deleted by its author LisaL Mar 2012 #20

Your post is rightwing, paronoid bullshit. bluestate10 Mar 2012 #22

Well we do agree on Zimmerman BOHICA12 Mar 2012 #23

Untrained, rogue individuals should not be allowed to declare themselves judge and executioner. Tommy_Carcetti Mar 2012 #24