Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: No charges filed against homeowner accused of shooting Bo Morrison [View all]ellisonz
(27,776 posts)92. Stupid question.
I think this guy acted with malice and with forethought. I think this is a matter for a judge and jury to make a determination and not a prosecutor.
Laura Segrin
about 2 hours ago
2 people like this reason
I'm asking everyone to put yourself in the Morrison family's shoes for just a minute. Ask yourself "What if this was my child or brother?" Don't say that it never will be because you cannot predict the future or what mistakes your child will or will not make. It can happen to any of us. Bo was hiding from the police to avoid an underage drinking ticket. This was not a crime that warranted death.
He was unarmed and was non-confrontational. The shooter stated that Bo did not say anything to him before he killed him. Bo took a step toward the shooter with his arms up, making it obvious that he wasn't armed. He had to walk past the shooter in order to get out of the porch as the shooter was between Bo and the door to the backyard. He was shot when he took that first step.
This gun owner claims to have extensive training and experience in firearm handling. If this is so, then responsible handling would be a reasonable expectation. A responsible gun owner would not discharge a weapon into a dark room at the first sign of movement. I read the 27-page District Attorney's report, and the gun owner stated several times that "he did not think about it, he just reacted." A responsible gun owner would think first and then react.
The shooter heard a noise, loaded his weapon with 6 bullets, opened the door from his kitchen to his porch, entered the porch, and shot in the dark at the first sign of movement. I've been awakened by noises in the night, and have never gone to investigate with a fully-loaded 6-shooter. I certainly wouldn't enter a room separated by a closed door if I suspected the noise to be coming from it, I would have called 911. In the time that it took for him to go to his shelf where he kept his unloaded gun in a case, remove the gun from the case, load it with 6 rounds, walk through the kitchen, open the door to the porch, and enter the porch (all in the dark), he could have called 911 and had the police there probably quicker considering they were only 1/2 block away according to the DA's report.
There were several other options for this homeowner that night. He could have used non-lethal mace to immobilize Bo and called 911 to come and arrest him and take him to jail. He chose to kill Bo instead. This behavior is not acceptable.
I've known Bo for about 11 years. I watched him grow up with my kids. He and my son were on a softball team together. He worked with my kids at a local restaurant. Bo was not a bad person. He was a good kid who made some mistakes, none of which deserved the death penalty.
Please put yourself in the Morrisons' shoes for a minute, and don't allow this to happen again.
To the Morrison family...
My deepest and sincere sympathies to all of you. Bo was a good friend to and loved by many. His beautiful smile will be sadly missed.
https://www.change.org/petitions/wisconsin-state-legislature-repeal-the-castle-doctrine-law-justice-for-bo-morrison
about 2 hours ago
2 people like this reason
I'm asking everyone to put yourself in the Morrison family's shoes for just a minute. Ask yourself "What if this was my child or brother?" Don't say that it never will be because you cannot predict the future or what mistakes your child will or will not make. It can happen to any of us. Bo was hiding from the police to avoid an underage drinking ticket. This was not a crime that warranted death.
He was unarmed and was non-confrontational. The shooter stated that Bo did not say anything to him before he killed him. Bo took a step toward the shooter with his arms up, making it obvious that he wasn't armed. He had to walk past the shooter in order to get out of the porch as the shooter was between Bo and the door to the backyard. He was shot when he took that first step.
This gun owner claims to have extensive training and experience in firearm handling. If this is so, then responsible handling would be a reasonable expectation. A responsible gun owner would not discharge a weapon into a dark room at the first sign of movement. I read the 27-page District Attorney's report, and the gun owner stated several times that "he did not think about it, he just reacted." A responsible gun owner would think first and then react.
The shooter heard a noise, loaded his weapon with 6 bullets, opened the door from his kitchen to his porch, entered the porch, and shot in the dark at the first sign of movement. I've been awakened by noises in the night, and have never gone to investigate with a fully-loaded 6-shooter. I certainly wouldn't enter a room separated by a closed door if I suspected the noise to be coming from it, I would have called 911. In the time that it took for him to go to his shelf where he kept his unloaded gun in a case, remove the gun from the case, load it with 6 rounds, walk through the kitchen, open the door to the porch, and enter the porch (all in the dark), he could have called 911 and had the police there probably quicker considering they were only 1/2 block away according to the DA's report.
There were several other options for this homeowner that night. He could have used non-lethal mace to immobilize Bo and called 911 to come and arrest him and take him to jail. He chose to kill Bo instead. This behavior is not acceptable.
I've known Bo for about 11 years. I watched him grow up with my kids. He and my son were on a softball team together. He worked with my kids at a local restaurant. Bo was not a bad person. He was a good kid who made some mistakes, none of which deserved the death penalty.
Please put yourself in the Morrisons' shoes for a minute, and don't allow this to happen again.
To the Morrison family...
My deepest and sincere sympathies to all of you. Bo was a good friend to and loved by many. His beautiful smile will be sadly missed.
https://www.change.org/petitions/wisconsin-state-legislature-repeal-the-castle-doctrine-law-justice-for-bo-morrison
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
159 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
No charges filed against homeowner accused of shooting Bo Morrison [View all]
Are_grits_groceries
Mar 2012
OP
Twice I have chased intruders from my home. I have never had to fire a shot. Just hearing a rifle
appleannie1
Mar 2012
#3
I worked in a PD for 15 years. Most burglars are not armed and more homeowners are shot with their
appleannie1
Mar 2012
#11
Assuming the homeowner is telling the truth that Morrison really did "take a step towards"
brentspeak
Mar 2012
#8
You have the location wrong. It was the back porch, and he likely trespassed to get there.
piedmont
Mar 2012
#23
I think a culture of "don't break into someone's home at 2 am" would have worked even better. nt
piedmont
Mar 2012
#33
yeah, but i still don't think it was justified, he could/should have just called the cops
JI7
Mar 2012
#22
in this case the guy was not inside the home, he was in the porch area hiding from cops
JI7
Mar 2012
#26
THis one is far from inexcusable....the guy came into the other guys house...
Joe the Revelator
Mar 2012
#36
I wouldn't expect my kids to be drunk and then break into someone's house to hide from the police
Joe the Revelator
Mar 2012
#48
So the DA wouldn't have pressed charges, even without castle doctrine, and your response is..
X_Digger
Mar 2012
#93
Exactly. He's making a choice, and no one is under any obligations to make apologies for this dude.
ellisonz
Mar 2012
#119
Actually, the DA and the cops are saying the defending homeowner called police in the first place.
ksbsnowowl
Mar 2012
#49
It's a very relevant question. You seem to believe that a party somehow means that the homeowner
Snake Alchemist
Mar 2012
#97
Maybe Bo should have manned up and accepted the underage drinking citation instead of breaking...
JVS
Mar 2012
#62
Really! It's not the homeowner's job to know the intentions of the guy breaking into his house
JVS
Mar 2012
#71
Do you believe that Bo is entitled to enter other people's houses without their consent?
JVS
Mar 2012
#77
Do you believe a homeowner is entitled to shoot an unarmed drunk kid in cold blood?
ellisonz
Mar 2012
#78
As in he knew there was a party, he confronted them, he then called the cops...
ellisonz
Mar 2012
#82
Because this has nothing to do with this case. You want it to, but it does not. nt
Snake Alchemist
Mar 2012
#107
Wait he had a father? Well that changes everything. Please post some more stories where homeowners
Snake Alchemist
Mar 2012
#135
Yeah I remember all the times I got drunk in high school...then ran from the cops, then broke into
Joe the Revelator
Mar 2012
#52
So if you succesfully defend yourself (not have any harm come to you) it is murder?
Kurska
Mar 2012
#53
You think you should have to run in your own house? Are you kidding me?
Joe the Revelator
Mar 2012
#68
Castle law and stand your ground are two very different things...but you know that.
Joe the Revelator
Mar 2012
#75
Your question should be "Did you ever break into someone's home while fleeing the cops?"
JVS
Mar 2012
#60
I'm sad for his family, but his son should not have broken into a house...he wasn't stalked, he
Joe the Revelator
Mar 2012
#80
I do have a kind of world-weary empathy for people who get themselves killed by doing stupid things.
Nye Bevan
Mar 2012
#129
That's no reason not to charge someone with a crime they may well have committed
treestar
Mar 2012
#132
Listen to what the DA dude says on the video. It's not just Castle Doctrine.
slackmaster
Mar 2012
#136