Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

elleng

(141,926 posts)
2. Yes, but
Sat Mar 24, 2012, 03:28 PM
Mar 2012

the Supremes themselves actually summarized the particular issues they were interested in hearing discussed, appointed counsel for some.
This article may somewhat mischaracterize the issues, but I wanted to provide the big picture for DUers.

Set out differently, this from Kaiser:

http://www.kaiserhealthnews.org/stories/2012/march/15/supreme-court-curtain-raiser.aspx

'What's the likely outcome?

Nobody knows. It's clear that the court's four more liberal members, like almost all other liberal legal experts, will find the law constitutional in all respects. It's also clear that conservative Justice Clarence Thomas will vote to strike down much or all of the law. It's less clear what swing-voting Justice Anthony Kennedy and conservative Chief Justice John Roberts as well as Justices Antonin Scalia and Samuel Alito will do.

Kennedy, Roberts, Alito, and (especially) Scalia -- whom the government's brief quotes five times -- have all joined past decisions construing federal regulatory power very broadly. Two respected conservative federal appeals court judges, Laurence Silberman and Geoffrey Sutton, who is one of Scalia's favorite law clerks, have upheld the law.'

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Summary of Supreme Court ...»Reply #2