General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: This message was self-deleted by its author [View all]Call Me Wesley
(38,187 posts)Not once I would have accused members who weren't mods as 'biased' or having 'inaccurate informations.' During the mod system, they simply had no information, and we mods were usually the bad guys; which you had to live with and it seems this thick skin is a bit lacking on fragile MIRT members.
You had to trust us to do the job we were given. Hosts nowadays have far much leeway to perform. We were on tight leashes, the rules were strict. There was no transparency, no discussion outside.
DU3 overruled this old, very tight set of a few who could operate in such an environment. That was a great call. That was a needed call. The mod system was becoming obsolete. And vastly so.
This was the premise of DU3: Transparency, democracy.
It saddens me to see that DU3 is going back to be 'modded,' instead of 'hosted.' And that includes the obvious 'secrecy' you try to keep your precious forum in, happily sharing private stuff with 40 other anonymous DU members who just happen to serve on the same term. If you were good with them, why the outrage sharing it with some others?
You brought in an alert that you were unsatisfied with into MIRT, which shouldn't have happened. MIRT is not for overruling a jury. MIRT is not for bullying admins into looking at posters behaviour after they passed a jury just because you thought it wasn't justified enough.
MIRT handles low-post-count trolls. You squeeze bugs and keep them out. That's your job. Nothing more.
I really don't think that what Hassin Bin Sober has done is 'spreading misunderstandings which make DU suck more.' It was, on the contrary, necessary.
Overstepping your job, calling all DU members who haven't been on MIRT and therefore know 'nothing,' about it: THAT makes DU suck.
You're not the police.