Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The Venn Diagram of Irrational Nonsense [View all]Orrex
(67,236 posts)129. A couple of points.
There certainly does seem to be an over-reliance on delivery by caesarean section, though I know quite a few women for whom it was necessary. The technique itself is valid and often justified, but if prescribed without real justification, then it's likely being misused. But that's misuse of an actual medical technique, rather than claiming that a magical belief system is science. The same is true of over-prescription of drugs; it's a misuse of an actual medical substance, and it's very different from claiming that copper bracelets cure arthritis (for example).
IMO, the chart is culturally biased, while including acupuncture, shiatsu and ayurvedic medicine, never mentioning, just for example, the nonsense of prescribing antidepressants for children.
That's a very questionable comparison. Acupuncture and shiatsu claim to manipulate the flow of chi, when chi has never been shown to exist. Not once, not ever. Similarly, ayurvedic medicine depends on medieval notions of "fundamental elements" which likewise have not been shown to exist. These are belief systems that may occasionally overlap with medicine, but in so far as they rely on mystical energy, they are pseudoscience and are rightly included on the list. Let these techniques demonstrate their efficacy under controlled conditions. If they can't meet that standard, then too bad for them.
That's not a cultural bias, either. If I claimed that I can heal people with Orgone energy--an invention of western culture--I would be required to demonstrate that this mystical energy exists and works as described.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
169 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
But their beliefs are based on someone's inner visions as they made themselves one with
Jgarrick
Mar 2014
#113
It's curious that magical thinkers like to pretend to have access to the "real" universe
Orrex
Mar 2014
#93
So it's better to peddle pseudoscientific crap and live an exciting life?
Vashta Nerada
Mar 2014
#85
And call people out on the Intertubes for bad engwish, (your misery not you misery)
snooper2
Mar 2014
#139
Seriously? You advocate that everyone take megadoses of vitamins, regardless if they need them or n
Thor_MN
Mar 2014
#135
Cool. Scientology is like one-stop shopping for all your bollocks needs.
Liberal Veteran
Mar 2014
#7
Using "ontological" like people don't know you mean "scientific materialism"
mathematic
Mar 2014
#68
"Perhaps you're hanging out around too many highly religious science skeptics." To be honest: nope.
AverageJoe90
Mar 2014
#75
I'd think "Trickle Down Economics" falls under the "Religious" and "Pseudoscientific" crescent.
HughBeaumont
Mar 2014
#51
I hesitantly K&R this. I'd remove a chunk of that - acupuncture and Ayurvedic med helped me
Sarah Ibarruri
Mar 2014
#136
For starters- that Karma is on there shows the utter stupidity of the person making the diagram.
KittyWampus
Mar 2014
#140