General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: This message was self-deleted by its author [View all]Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)People who try to use the forum as a platform to air their grievances about this group or that group of long time members who, in their opinion, "don't belong on DU".
I've done 3 terms on MIRT, now.. The first 2 I was impressed by how well people- many of whom had long running disagreements outside of MIRT- were able to leave their personal grinding axes outside the door and perform professionally on the joint task at hand.
The last term, unfortunately, there were a few characters who were determined to drag all sorts of meta style drama into the MIRT forum, who thought that MIRT was the place to launch into extended diatribes against groups of long time DU members that they personally had some beef with. It was grossly inappropriate, IMHO, although I didn't weigh in on those discussions because I felt that would only exacerbate and perpetuate the situation. It simply DID NOT BELONG.
Also, I want to remind you, since you keep hammering that one point- there is NO official mandate for any level of MIRT participation. Every time I was on the team I was fortunately able to put in some solid time, but different people have different abilities or inclinations to participate. Admin puts a large number of people on the team deliberately with the understanding that people will participate as they are able, AFAIUI. Also MIRT operates on consensus, and there is no seniority or "boss" or weighted vote based upon how much one is there. EVERY term there have been people who participate more, or less. Far more problematic than people not participating as much, to my mind, again is those who would mistakenly appoint themselves as some sort of authority inside MIRT, or try to -again- use that forum as a platform to bad mouth groups of long time DU members. Not everyone here is going to agree on everything, and anyone who can't handle that, probably doesnt belong on MIRT.