General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: This message was self-deleted by its author [View all]seaglass
(8,185 posts)about 4 known disruptors that are nuke on sight. If I recall that thread there wasn't an alert or a bad post made just a head's up that this user was familiar with DU and was likely a returnee.
Now I seem to recall that Skinner has said that people who are banned can return as long as they don't exhibit the same behavior and are low key - obviously a returnee that stirs crap upon return and gets posts hidden is not flying under the radar and is not who he is talking about. And there are exceptions to the rule. But while I was on MIRT the person did not cause trouble.
So I see nothing wrong with acknowledging that someone had previously been on DU. There are people posting right now who have previously been banned. Pretzel Warrior who was previously banned just got banned for the 2nd time and he was a shit-stirrer, lots of people knew for 2 years that loli was a previously banned poster.
Can you see how there are some inconsistencies here?
I guess you knew who the returnee was - I certainly didn't and still don't, nor do I know if she had posts hidden before she was banned, I wasn't on MIRT any longer. Are you making assumptions that people knew who she was?