Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The Venn Diagram of Irrational Nonsense [View all]zappaman
(20,627 posts)153. Too late
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Ear_candling
The performance involves laying the victim "patient" on their side, and burning a special hollow candle over their ear canal. The heat is supposed to draw the impurities from the ear out of the canal and onto the base of the candle. When visible residue is seen at the base of the candle after the process the practitioner and wooee assume that wax was removed from the ear canal by some sort of quantum warm air currents.[1] This residue is, of course, simply burnt wax from the candle that has run down the inside.
While one might think "it's harmless and cheap, so who cares?", the procedure comes with potential downsides - the most obvious is that hot wax from the candle might drip into the ear, burning the victim patient. There are also all the usual hazards associated with playing with fire indoors.[2] There is no need for an alternative method to removing excess cerumen buildups. You can break down cerumen by using oil - commercial ear wax removal oils typically use peanut oil, although any vegetable oil will do the job. If you have a large deposit that isn't shifting, you can typically have it pumped out in a few minutes by a nurse. You very rarely need surgery for this, and that's only if they've tried pumping it out already. Talk to your doctor.
It is also claimed to remove "toxins" from the body by sucking them out with the warm air current. These "toxins" inevitably set off the smoke detector, so if you hear the smoke detector going off during ear candling, you know it's working!
The performance involves laying the victim "patient" on their side, and burning a special hollow candle over their ear canal. The heat is supposed to draw the impurities from the ear out of the canal and onto the base of the candle. When visible residue is seen at the base of the candle after the process the practitioner and wooee assume that wax was removed from the ear canal by some sort of quantum warm air currents.[1] This residue is, of course, simply burnt wax from the candle that has run down the inside.
While one might think "it's harmless and cheap, so who cares?", the procedure comes with potential downsides - the most obvious is that hot wax from the candle might drip into the ear, burning the victim patient. There are also all the usual hazards associated with playing with fire indoors.[2] There is no need for an alternative method to removing excess cerumen buildups. You can break down cerumen by using oil - commercial ear wax removal oils typically use peanut oil, although any vegetable oil will do the job. If you have a large deposit that isn't shifting, you can typically have it pumped out in a few minutes by a nurse. You very rarely need surgery for this, and that's only if they've tried pumping it out already. Talk to your doctor.
It is also claimed to remove "toxins" from the body by sucking them out with the warm air current. These "toxins" inevitably set off the smoke detector, so if you hear the smoke detector going off during ear candling, you know it's working!
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
169 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
But their beliefs are based on someone's inner visions as they made themselves one with
Jgarrick
Mar 2014
#113
It's curious that magical thinkers like to pretend to have access to the "real" universe
Orrex
Mar 2014
#93
So it's better to peddle pseudoscientific crap and live an exciting life?
Vashta Nerada
Mar 2014
#85
And call people out on the Intertubes for bad engwish, (your misery not you misery)
snooper2
Mar 2014
#139
Seriously? You advocate that everyone take megadoses of vitamins, regardless if they need them or n
Thor_MN
Mar 2014
#135
Cool. Scientology is like one-stop shopping for all your bollocks needs.
Liberal Veteran
Mar 2014
#7
Using "ontological" like people don't know you mean "scientific materialism"
mathematic
Mar 2014
#68
"Perhaps you're hanging out around too many highly religious science skeptics." To be honest: nope.
AverageJoe90
Mar 2014
#75
I'd think "Trickle Down Economics" falls under the "Religious" and "Pseudoscientific" crescent.
HughBeaumont
Mar 2014
#51
I hesitantly K&R this. I'd remove a chunk of that - acupuncture and Ayurvedic med helped me
Sarah Ibarruri
Mar 2014
#136
For starters- that Karma is on there shows the utter stupidity of the person making the diagram.
KittyWampus
Mar 2014
#140