General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I Will Do My Best To Make This My Last OP On Obama's Brussels Remarks, But... [View all]Gothmog
(179,446 posts)President Obama was making the case under international law that Putin's claims about the annexation of Crimea were false and part of that legal argument was distinguishing or pointing out the legal differences between the Iraq invasion and the annexation of Crimea. President Obama acknowledged that he disagree with the premise of the war and spending any more time on that concept would have distracted from and hurt the legal case that he was making.
I was on law review when I was in law school and I can see the pros and cons on how President Obama framed his argument. While I still hate bush, rice, cheney and rumsfeld for lying about the reasons for the war, I agree with the way the President Obama framed this argument. Again, making complicated legal arguments is not that easy and I understand why President Obama framed his argument.