Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)A cashless economy leads to a safer society [View all]
Cash", wrote Marcus Felson, an eminent American criminologist, is the mothers milk of crime. Its appeal to criminals is clear. Unlike cars or paintings, it can be concealed immediately after being pinched. It has no security features to prevent its being easily and anonymously spent on legal or illegal goods. Unlike nearly any other object that can be stolen, it needs no fence.
Criminals need for cash motivates much predatory street crime. A new paper from the National Bureau of Economic Research asks whether this might work in reverse: if cash motivates crime, could the absence of cash reduce crime? The answer seems to be yes.
The paper looks at county-level crime data in Missouri from 1990 to 2011, a period when crime dropped markedly all over the rich world. During this time Missouri, like the rest of America, changed the way it delivered its welfare and food-stamp benefits. Instead of paper cheques states now use a debit-card system known as Electronic Benefit Transfer (EBT). Missouri introduced EBT cards in eight phases over 12 months. This gradual shift allowed the authors to analyse not just differences in crime rates before and after the introduction of EBT, but also how those differences compared with changes during the same period in counties that had not implemented it.
They found that electronic payments led to a drop of 9.8% in the overall crime rate and caused the rates of burglary, assault and larceny to fall by 7.9%, 12.5% and 9.6%, respectively. The introduction of EBT was also associated with a lower number of arrests, an indication that the crime rates decline did not stem from more aggressive policing. EBTs effects on non-property-related crimes such as drug offences, rape and prostitution were statistically insignificant. The findings suggest, according to Volkan Topalli, one of the authors, that for people in densely populated urban neighbourhoods, the less cash they have and the more their transactions are digitised, the less attractive criminal targets they make.
http://www.economist.com/news/finance-and-economics/21600149-cashless-economy-leads-safer-society-less-coin-purloin?zid=317&ah=8a47fc455a44945580198768fad0fa41
Criminals need for cash motivates much predatory street crime. A new paper from the National Bureau of Economic Research asks whether this might work in reverse: if cash motivates crime, could the absence of cash reduce crime? The answer seems to be yes.
The paper looks at county-level crime data in Missouri from 1990 to 2011, a period when crime dropped markedly all over the rich world. During this time Missouri, like the rest of America, changed the way it delivered its welfare and food-stamp benefits. Instead of paper cheques states now use a debit-card system known as Electronic Benefit Transfer (EBT). Missouri introduced EBT cards in eight phases over 12 months. This gradual shift allowed the authors to analyse not just differences in crime rates before and after the introduction of EBT, but also how those differences compared with changes during the same period in counties that had not implemented it.
They found that electronic payments led to a drop of 9.8% in the overall crime rate and caused the rates of burglary, assault and larceny to fall by 7.9%, 12.5% and 9.6%, respectively. The introduction of EBT was also associated with a lower number of arrests, an indication that the crime rates decline did not stem from more aggressive policing. EBTs effects on non-property-related crimes such as drug offences, rape and prostitution were statistically insignificant. The findings suggest, according to Volkan Topalli, one of the authors, that for people in densely populated urban neighbourhoods, the less cash they have and the more their transactions are digitised, the less attractive criminal targets they make.
http://www.economist.com/news/finance-and-economics/21600149-cashless-economy-leads-safer-society-less-coin-purloin?zid=317&ah=8a47fc455a44945580198768fad0fa41
38 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
It's odd how a crime that as recently as the sixties could carry the death penalty
Sen. Walter Sobchak
Apr 2014
#35
Given that it's a global currency - all governments would be subject to it.
TampaAnimusVortex
Apr 2014
#21
Yes, generally freedom/anonymity and security can be traded for one another... (nt)
Recursion
Apr 2014
#8
And a cash economy is an anonymous economy, which is why Big Brother hates cash.
bemildred
Apr 2014
#16
"Criminals’ need for cash motivates much predatory street crime." Indeed----WALL STREET.
WinkyDink
Apr 2014
#17
MPesa in Kenya has changed everything... you carry your cash through a phone connected wallet
JCMach1
Apr 2014
#22
My wife's grandparents lived through the depression. She was raised with the belief of not trusting
diabeticman
Apr 2014
#27
In Kenya, you would just MPESA (like a text message) the payment to the company
JCMach1
Apr 2014
#38