Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
Sat Apr 5, 2014, 10:38 PM Apr 2014

A cashless economy leads to a safer society [View all]

“Cash", wrote Marcus Felson, an eminent American criminologist, “is the mother’s milk of crime.” Its appeal to criminals is clear. Unlike cars or paintings, it can be concealed immediately after being pinched. It has no security features to prevent its being easily and anonymously spent on legal or illegal goods. Unlike nearly any other object that can be stolen, it needs no fence.

Criminals’ need for cash motivates much predatory street crime. A new paper from the National Bureau of Economic Research asks whether this might work in reverse: if cash motivates crime, could the absence of cash reduce crime? The answer seems to be yes.

The paper looks at county-level crime data in Missouri from 1990 to 2011, a period when crime dropped markedly all over the rich world. During this time Missouri, like the rest of America, changed the way it delivered its welfare and food-stamp benefits. Instead of paper cheques states now use a debit-card system known as Electronic Benefit Transfer (EBT). Missouri introduced EBT cards in eight phases over 12 months. This gradual shift allowed the authors to analyse not just differences in crime rates before and after the introduction of EBT, but also how those differences compared with changes during the same period in counties that had not implemented it.

They found that electronic payments led to a drop of 9.8% in the overall crime rate and caused the rates of burglary, assault and larceny to fall by 7.9%, 12.5% and 9.6%, respectively. The introduction of EBT was also associated with a lower number of arrests, an indication that the crime rate’s decline did not stem from more aggressive policing. EBT’s effects on non-property-related crimes such as drug offences, rape and prostitution were statistically insignificant. The findings suggest, according to Volkan Topalli, one of the authors, that “for people in densely populated urban neighbourhoods, the less cash they have and the more their transactions are digitised, the less attractive criminal targets they make.”

http://www.economist.com/news/finance-and-economics/21600149-cashless-economy-leads-safer-society-less-coin-purloin?zid=317&ah=8a47fc455a44945580198768fad0fa41


38 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A cashless economy empowers the big banks even more. House of Roberts Apr 2014 #1
Doesn't need to be strictly cash. Lucky Luciano Apr 2014 #7
The problem with a cashless economy is that it can get hacked Warpy Apr 2014 #2
People carry less cash, but more value Sen. Walter Sobchak Apr 2014 #3
The risk vs reward ratio needs to be changed seveneyes Apr 2014 #20
It's odd how a crime that as recently as the sixties could carry the death penalty Sen. Walter Sobchak Apr 2014 #35
Do smart phones have any value if they are stolen? delta17 Apr 2014 #28
In most instances change the SIM card and away you go Sen. Walter Sobchak Apr 2014 #33
Every single purchase can be tracked in a cashless society DJ13 Apr 2014 #4
As well as location, employment, history, and yes, medical. Skip Intro Apr 2014 #12
Its based on a 1% class-warrior's redefinition of "crime" cprise Apr 2014 #14
Post removed Post removed Apr 2014 #5
I'm worried about that too.... n/t Victor_c3 Apr 2014 #15
Bitcoin would be a panacea then, right? lumberjack_jeff Apr 2014 #6
No: bitcoin's supply is determined by algorithm rather than policy Recursion Apr 2014 #9
Given that it's a global currency - all governments would be subject to it. TampaAnimusVortex Apr 2014 #21
Then the entire world becomes the Eurozone Recursion Apr 2014 #23
Yes, generally freedom/anonymity and security can be traded for one another... (nt) Recursion Apr 2014 #8
+1 nt lumberjack_jeff Apr 2014 #10
Talk about total control. n/t Skip Intro Apr 2014 #11
It has been my observation that those SheilaT Apr 2014 #13
I often use my debit card, but I keep close track of what I'm spending. Louisiana1976 Apr 2014 #29
At 40 bucks a pop for overdrafts... SomethingFishy Apr 2014 #30
Once someone has been badly burned by the overdraft charges SheilaT Apr 2014 #31
And a cash economy is an anonymous economy, which is why Big Brother hates cash. bemildred Apr 2014 #16
"Criminals’ need for cash motivates much predatory street crime." Indeed----WALL STREET. WinkyDink Apr 2014 #17
how would politicians hide their bribes? hobbit709 Apr 2014 #18
Oh NOES! 99Forever Apr 2014 #19
They actually were protected. former9thward Apr 2014 #34
What happens when your cash is stolen? NYC Liberal Apr 2014 #36
MPesa in Kenya has changed everything... you carry your cash through a phone connected wallet JCMach1 Apr 2014 #22
My wife's grandparents lived through the depression. She was raised with the belief of not trusting diabeticman Apr 2014 #27
In Kenya, you would just MPESA (like a text message) the payment to the company JCMach1 Apr 2014 #38
less privacy Liberal_in_LA Apr 2014 #24
Crime aside... pipi_k Apr 2014 #25
We need to get all the cash in a pile and burn it! zappaman Apr 2014 #26
I never carry cash. I have $1 in my wallet. RebelOne Apr 2014 #32
I very, very rarely use cash. NYC Liberal Apr 2014 #37
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»A cashless economy leads ...