General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: U.S.'s Amazing New 'Don't Text and Drive' Ad Will Leave You Shaking [View all]customerserviceguy
(25,406 posts)And indeed, there are really stupid obsessive people who have done and will do this. However, I don't find the compulsive nature of the text message to be anywhere as pronounced with an email, most people know that it doesn't have to be responded to immediately. Blame (or credit) spam for that, most people know it's not worth risking your life for an email about a sale at Kohl's.
Can you at least support taking texting away from those who have been multiple offenders? If you get busted for driving while drunk, you may be in a jurisdiction that requires you to install an ignition interlock for a period of time. I know a guy at work who had to have one, it was very expensive to pay for on a monthly basis, including monitoring fees. How about that cell phone blocking device being required for those who have been busted on two or more occasions, with licence suspension for those who can't follow the rules?
The two conditions are similar in their destructive effects, but I observe that it would be much, much easier to stop a dozen telcos from offering texting than it would be to eliminate bars. When we get the self-driving car, the world will be a much safer place, but until we're there, can't I just worry about drunks, and not the growing popularity of texting?