General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: This message was self-deleted by its author [View all]cthulu2016
(10,960 posts)My post did not offer a definition of homeopathy for you to contradict or support.
The word means, essentially, "like the disease," as the two roots of the word suggest, and was, back in the day, the practice of poisoning sick people on the theory that... hey, why not?
Surely something to defend if you fell like defending it (?) but, fortunately, not what homeopathy means today.
Though my post did not define homeopathy it did offer a description of what Homeopathy is, quote, "in contemporary practice" (those three words are also in the dictionary) and a statement that a contemporary homeopathic "medicine" has no active ingredients.
Which it doesn't. That is contemporary homeopathy.
But, of course, perhaps the utterly idiotic OP was written to defend the ancient practice of poisoning sick people, instead of the contemporary practice of selling them entirely fake medicine.
If the OP has a deep understanding of the history of homeopathy and was drawing on that knowledge in seeking to defend either the antique practice of poisoning sick people, or the modern practice of selling sick people fake medicine, then I was wrong.