Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: BREAKING: Cliven Bundy DEMANDS National Park Service Employees be disarmed. [View all]jwirr
(39,215 posts)42. Handing the guns over to them will only increase the danger. I cannot see them handing them over.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
66 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
BREAKING: Cliven Bundy DEMANDS National Park Service Employees be disarmed. [View all]
MohRokTah
Apr 2014
OP
Because federal law enforcement officers do not have 2nd Amenment rights to bear arms
bluestateguy
Apr 2014
#2
If it weren't so serious a situation, wouldn't you want to say this violates the workers' second
karynnj
Apr 2014
#3
Armed violent "militia" = Patriots. Unarmed "Occupy" protestors = Dangerous terrorists.
WinkyDink
Apr 2014
#48
1. Dogs aren't humans or citizens. 2.These ARMED Right-wingers who flout the law ARE TERRORISTS.
WinkyDink
Apr 2014
#55
I'm just wondering about the actual numbers, not the reality of police brutality. As for dogs: I
WinkyDink
Apr 2014
#65
Handing the guns over to them will only increase the danger. I cannot see them handing them over.
jwirr
Apr 2014
#42
I wish the LV Review Journal had cited some source for this blurb. Very fluid situation, it seems.
pinto
Apr 2014
#13
I believe SWAT and others are there so BLM can get their equipment out and traffic issues
maddezmom
Apr 2014
#17
I asked him for a link to who said that he said that and so far.......crickets.
IronGate
Apr 2014
#34
"without hurting him or any of his followers." I'm just not seeing the downside here.
WinkyDink
Apr 2014
#49
As much as I'd love to see an AC-130 gunship wipe this asshole from the face of the earth...
NutmegYankee
Apr 2014
#60
Sooner or later, something's going to be enough to spark these fools into action.
ladyVet
Apr 2014
#47
Never did laugh at them. Was wary of them from the moment they hit the scene.
Jake Stern
Apr 2014
#66
Well.. I DEMAND that Cliven Bundy be disarmed.. The man is a domestic terrorist.
annabanana
Apr 2014
#51
In that situation the round-up stopped was the best choice when men with rifles could have
Sunlei
Apr 2014
#63
He now meets the US government's definition of a terrorist and is a threat to America
rustydog
Apr 2014
#58