Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

The Answer 'No' Is So Obvious, Sir, One Is Almost Embarrassed To Click It The Magistrate Apr 2014 #1
What The Magistrate Said. nt MADem Apr 2014 #2
You said it best. eom MohRokTah Apr 2014 #4
yes very obvious nt steve2470 Apr 2014 #7
why not? Really? bowens43 Apr 2014 #3
We have never gone to war with an entity capable of nuking American cities... cthulu2016 Apr 2014 #5
This reminds me of a Toon I just saw... Electric Monk Apr 2014 #6
Last thing we need is another trillions dollar war for nothing. Initech Apr 2014 #8
Directly? "Boots on the ground"? Maybe. In other ways yes. Tierra_y_Libertad Apr 2014 #9
We can't help but lose to Russia on this LittleBlue Apr 2014 #10
I think that's spot on. CFLDem Apr 2014 #12
It would have to if the Ukraine is invaded AcertainLiz Apr 2014 #11
Why? We have no accords with Ukraine. They are not a part of NATO Bandit Apr 2014 #15
Well, the US has enough vital interests in the Ukraine to get involved in its politics AcertainLiz Apr 2014 #19
Well we certainly know who the dreamer is. Bandit Apr 2014 #20
Oh, please AcertainLiz Apr 2014 #21
If any NATO country were to be attacked we would get involved but Ukraine nor Crimea Bandit Apr 2014 #22
Crimea wasn't attacked, it was just Russians already stationed there securing the area AcertainLiz Apr 2014 #23
Actually Bandit is correct nadinbrzezinski Apr 2014 #25
I just don't see the US sitting by while Ukraine is conquered. AcertainLiz Apr 2014 #27
I do, because of those nuclear warheads nadinbrzezinski Apr 2014 #30
Yeah okay you make some really fair points AcertainLiz Apr 2014 #32
We are, by trashing their economy, nadinbrzezinski Apr 2014 #33
The Russian economy is being trashed? AcertainLiz Apr 2014 #34
The sanctions are not innefective nadinbrzezinski Apr 2014 #35
Well, someone did send me this AcertainLiz Apr 2014 #36
This is a very long game, not a short one nadinbrzezinski Apr 2014 #38
Yeah but I don't want any nuking AcertainLiz Apr 2014 #39
And that is why you will not see one US Trooper nadinbrzezinski Apr 2014 #40
I don't think they'd attack if the US were in Ukraine AcertainLiz Apr 2014 #41
What troops? nadinbrzezinski Apr 2014 #42
I think the Ukranians would want to be defended now AcertainLiz Apr 2014 #44
But they are not members right now nadinbrzezinski Apr 2014 #45
They should be. AcertainLiz Apr 2014 #46
But they are not nadinbrzezinski Apr 2014 #47
Insane. AcertainLiz Apr 2014 #49
Read this nadinbrzezinski Apr 2014 #50
Thanks :) AcertainLiz Apr 2014 #51
It truly depends on one thing nadinbrzezinski Apr 2014 #13
Why isn't there an option for "not officially or overtly"? Raksha Apr 2014 #14
"Involved," in what manner? 1000words Apr 2014 #16
No, but we should send those militia guys from Nevada XRubicon Apr 2014 #17
Lol CFLDem Apr 2014 #24
We'd have to fly them in, though... Democracyinkind Apr 2014 #29
True, we'd probably have to provide Depends too XRubicon Apr 2014 #31
Only if it spills over into Poland. n/t tammywammy Apr 2014 #18
No, the US in no way wants an escalated war with a nuclear power like Russia. It would be insane, RKP5637 Apr 2014 #26
Aside from PMC's and intel, no. Democracyinkind Apr 2014 #28
Unofficially I bet the US Military is in the Ukraine right now. Exposethefrauds Apr 2014 #37
Of course not. Bluenorthwest Apr 2014 #43
I voted no. bigwillq Apr 2014 #48
BECAUSE RUSSIA HAS NUKES! B Calm Apr 2014 #52
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Will the US get militaril...»Reply #50