Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Artist gives birth to vaginal painting [View all]Orrex
(67,083 posts)95. Well, that's not really an answer
If a non-participating bystander kicked out the scaffolding, and 100 other non-participating bystanders called it art, does that make it art? Deferring to the fleeting will of some majority, by which standard everything can potentially be called art, is simply a way to declare that everything is art, without having to put oneself on the hook for making that statement.
I'm not saying that I can offer a solid way to define art, but I have never heard or read a definition that couldn't easily be interpreted to encompass the entirety of human endeavor.
If a bystander kicked one of the scaffolds out from under her and was working with her--it would be part of the art. If a bystander was just being an arrogant angry jerk, then it would be assault. Duh?
Why specifically can assault not be art? I'm not saying that it is; I'm asking why you are saying that it is not.Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
164 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
you had a naked woman, in the middle of square and even that could not draw a crowd to her stupid.
seabeyond
Apr 2014
#26
just because it is allowed does not mean that the poster may not use discretion.
Tuesday Afternoon
Apr 2014
#114
I think anything that doesn't contribute directly to your physical survival is "art".
Marr
Apr 2014
#150
At least she wasn't degraded by being on the cover of a sports magazine
The Straight Story
Apr 2014
#21
We were talking about the desperate attempts of youth to try and "shock" and call it art.
KittyWampus
Apr 2014
#22
I've never seen nor heard of Trunick, but that photo and event you showed is actually quite lovely.
KittyWampus
Apr 2014
#100
I bet dollars to donuts they ran out sometime in the early days of the roman empire
MattBaggins
Apr 2014
#139
A couple days a month, most premenopausal women could do this without paintballs.
pnwmom
Apr 2014
#55
This is just like Jim Carey bending over and using his hands to move his butt cheeks
MattBaggins
Apr 2014
#140
At least she didn't degrade herself by appearing on the cover of the swimsuit issue of SI.
Vashta Nerada
Apr 2014
#42
I can give this points for good muscular control, but beyond that, not much! n/t
RKP5637
Apr 2014
#51
She's claiming she says that to any man who is a sex positive feminist...
Violet_Crumble
Apr 2014
#156
You mean there are bad, unskilled ways to squirt paint out of your cooch?
Frank Cannon
Apr 2014
#109
If a bystander had kicked one of the scaffolds out from under her, would that be art?
Orrex
Apr 2014
#90
That is not what you said. As for Art/Performance Art, I could give/take a shit.
Tuesday Afternoon
Apr 2014
#146